The question was “would you rather be alone in the woods with a man or a bear”, right? Is this not the logical conclusion of the bear option? Like, I very much agree this is bad hearted revenge fantasy but this is the logical conclusion of choosing the bear. They’re not cuddly.
Explain. If you were teleported directly in front of a bear and directly in front of a stranger, how you would fare better with the bear. In detail, please.
No, that wasn’t the question. Are you moving the goal post to be offended?
If there’s a bear 800m away from me, he’s not likely to move in my direction. If he moves in my direction, then of course I’ll turn around and run and that’ll be it.
If there’s a man 800m away from a woman in the woods, she doesn’t know what he’s going to do. If he starts going in her direction, she still doesn’t know what he’s going to do, so maybe she waits until he’s much closer. And when he’s much closer, she still doesn’t know what he’ll do, right until it’s too late. Maybe he’ll just say hi your shoelace is undone, or maybe he’ll stab you.
That’s the point. You don’t know how dangerous the man might be and you don’t know how worse your odds get the longer you fail to react. You know what to do with a bear and you can react immediately to be safe sooner.
…What? If that wasn’t the question then what WAS the question?
What, the question is if you’re in like a mile radius of it? Lmao obviously the bear then. That’s even more of a dumb question. Wait all this time it was literally just “if you’re in the general large vicinity of” and not right next to? Jesus. What’s the point of that? I’d rather be lost randomly in a forest with a bear than even a serial killer, that’s an easy choice.
The question was “would you rather be alone in the woods with a man or a bear”
Would you rather come across a man or a bear, would you rather be alone with a man or a bear… None of this means “the bear is right in your face.” Having a bear come right to your face is obviously not the same as having a stranger walk right next to you, the bear is obviously more dangerous in this case. But the question is not about having a bear in your face.
What, the question is if you’re in like a mile radius of it? Lmao obviously the bear then. That’s even more of a dumb question. Wait all this time it was literally just “if you’re in the general large vicinity of” and not right next to? Jesus. What’s the point of that? I’d rather be lost randomly in a forest with a bear than even a serial killer, that’s an easy choice.
Exactly. Some people do get that detail and still get offended, and a lot of people miss it and make the discussion harder without even thinking they misunderstood something.
Jesus Christ have you people ever been outside? You act like all men are just raping beasts being kept back by a thin thread. Have you ever considered that one of those things a man could do would BE NICE? Like a HUMAN? Probably not since you clearly don’t even consider them human. Good God I am so disappointed in humanity.
No, I do not act like like all men are raping beasts. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Especially since I am myself a man. So I know for certain we aren’t all raping beasts.
But please, show me one bear that has raped a human woman. We get stories like that all the time from men. And we should be angry towards them for making men look bad, rather than towards the women who fear us.
I’m clearly done with this but “a consequence man is free from anything”? Really? You sound like those fucking religious wackadoos who think the only thing holding them back from horrific crimes is God. Maybe a consequence free man just wants a fucking hug, asshole.
You’re reinterpreting the comment and doing so in a way that misses the crux of their argument.
They are commenting on the cartoon being a vengeance fantasy against women. Which it is.
So women’s choices are now men having revenge fantasy ?? So you’re a misandrist.
No, the women’s choice didn’t include men making revenge fantasy posts. Don’t move the goal posts.
The question was “would you rather be alone in the woods with a man or a bear”, right? Is this not the logical conclusion of the bear option? Like, I very much agree this is bad hearted revenge fantasy but this is the logical conclusion of choosing the bear. They’re not cuddly.
No, it is absolutely not.
Explain. If you were teleported directly in front of a bear and directly in front of a stranger, how you would fare better with the bear. In detail, please.
No, that wasn’t the question. Are you moving the goal post to be offended?
If there’s a bear 800m away from me, he’s not likely to move in my direction. If he moves in my direction, then of course I’ll turn around and run and that’ll be it.
If there’s a man 800m away from a woman in the woods, she doesn’t know what he’s going to do. If he starts going in her direction, she still doesn’t know what he’s going to do, so maybe she waits until he’s much closer. And when he’s much closer, she still doesn’t know what he’ll do, right until it’s too late. Maybe he’ll just say hi your shoelace is undone, or maybe he’ll stab you.
That’s the point. You don’t know how dangerous the man might be and you don’t know how worse your odds get the longer you fail to react. You know what to do with a bear and you can react immediately to be safe sooner.
…What? If that wasn’t the question then what WAS the question?
What, the question is if you’re in like a mile radius of it? Lmao obviously the bear then. That’s even more of a dumb question. Wait all this time it was literally just “if you’re in the general large vicinity of” and not right next to? Jesus. What’s the point of that? I’d rather be lost randomly in a forest with a bear than even a serial killer, that’s an easy choice.
Would you rather come across a man or a bear, would you rather be alone with a man or a bear… None of this means “the bear is right in your face.” Having a bear come right to your face is obviously not the same as having a stranger walk right next to you, the bear is obviously more dangerous in this case. But the question is not about having a bear in your face.
Exactly. Some people do get that detail and still get offended, and a lot of people miss it and make the discussion harder without even thinking they misunderstood something.
No, the question was: would you rather be alone in the woods next to a random man or a random bear.
This implies anonymity and no consequences of actions. So the way people act online.
A consequence free man is capable of anything. A bear would only maul you.
Jesus Christ have you people ever been outside? You act like all men are just raping beasts being kept back by a thin thread. Have you ever considered that one of those things a man could do would BE NICE? Like a HUMAN? Probably not since you clearly don’t even consider them human. Good God I am so disappointed in humanity.
No, I do not act like like all men are raping beasts. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Especially since I am myself a man. So I know for certain we aren’t all raping beasts.
But please, show me one bear that has raped a human woman. We get stories like that all the time from men. And we should be angry towards them for making men look bad, rather than towards the women who fear us.
I mean it wasn’t exactly rape but
I’m clearly done with this but “a consequence man is free from anything”? Really? You sound like those fucking religious wackadoos who think the only thing holding them back from horrific crimes is God. Maybe a consequence free man just wants a fucking hug, asshole.
Here’s a short video of women being outside in public spaces: https://www.tiktok.com/@specere/video/7472932570162924831
Imagine encountering that on a daily basis and then someone asks you how you’d feel encountering a random man in the woods?
This is the perfect case for a “No you”. As in YOU are the one moving goalposts by saying “How dare men talk back”.