It works pretty much the same way that all of our values do. From the big bundle of things we care about, we derive a bunch of heuristics that help us to make decisions in life, and this greatly simplifies our choices. For instance, I value being considered authentic and trustworthy, so in general, I follow the rule of “do not lie”.
However, these heuristics inevitably fail when confronted with the complexity of the real world, so we end up having to adjust on the fly, sometimes prioritising one value over another; I might find myself in a situation where my general policy of honesty is in tension with my policy of “don’t be an asshole”, and I may decide that in this instance, lying feels morally acceptable (or even necessary).
In the context of veganism, an example of this kind of negotiation might be if a vegan mistakenly buys something containing animal products. If sustainability is a significant component of their veganism, then they might prefer to eat the food rather than waste it. Someone else might choose differently, depending on their underlying values. Sometimes even the same person with the same values might choose differently, depending on their circumstances (someone who is ill and exhausted might be more likely to eat something non-vegan, for example)
I agree that “it’s impossible to be truly moral in this hell world”, but I imagine you still try to live by your moral values? If you were to picture yourself saying the most vicious things you could possibly muster to a dear friend in a deliberate attempt to hurt them, that probably feels bad to imagine, right? And yet, it’s inevitable that we will, at some point, do or say something to hurt the people we care about, despite our best efforts to avoid that. We can never be perfect, in anything we do. What matters is the intention, combined with a genuine effort to live by our values.
For me, the most important part of living in a moral manner is regularly reflecting on whether my actions are aligning with my values. I tried to go vegetarian a year or so back, but unfortunately, my life is too hectic for that to be a viable option for me right now — I already struggle with building healthy eating habits, and adding additional restrictions on top of that led to me failing in my basic duty to my own wellbeing. I had to step back and re-evaluate my priorities, which led to me deciding that whilst going fully veggie is still a long term goal, for now, I’m just going to focus on reducing the amount of meat products I eat.
I feel a bit uncomfortable to have to make that compromise, but that’s sort of the point, I reckon. Having to walk the tightrope between values that are in tension with each other is our opportunity to show our moral mettle. It’s ultimately a personal choice, so there aren’t really any right or wrong answers (because we’re the ones grading our own tests, so to speak). We’ve just got to be mindful about it, and try not to beat ourselves up so much that we end up making it harder to make choices that feel right.
It works pretty much the same way that all of our values do. From the big bundle of things we care about, we derive a bunch of heuristics that help us to make decisions in life, and this greatly simplifies our choices. For instance, I value being considered authentic and trustworthy, so in general, I follow the rule of “do not lie”.
However, these heuristics inevitably fail when confronted with the complexity of the real world, so we end up having to adjust on the fly, sometimes prioritising one value over another; I might find myself in a situation where my general policy of honesty is in tension with my policy of “don’t be an asshole”, and I may decide that in this instance, lying feels morally acceptable (or even necessary).
In the context of veganism, an example of this kind of negotiation might be if a vegan mistakenly buys something containing animal products. If sustainability is a significant component of their veganism, then they might prefer to eat the food rather than waste it. Someone else might choose differently, depending on their underlying values. Sometimes even the same person with the same values might choose differently, depending on their circumstances (someone who is ill and exhausted might be more likely to eat something non-vegan, for example)
I agree that “it’s impossible to be truly moral in this hell world”, but I imagine you still try to live by your moral values? If you were to picture yourself saying the most vicious things you could possibly muster to a dear friend in a deliberate attempt to hurt them, that probably feels bad to imagine, right? And yet, it’s inevitable that we will, at some point, do or say something to hurt the people we care about, despite our best efforts to avoid that. We can never be perfect, in anything we do. What matters is the intention, combined with a genuine effort to live by our values.
For me, the most important part of living in a moral manner is regularly reflecting on whether my actions are aligning with my values. I tried to go vegetarian a year or so back, but unfortunately, my life is too hectic for that to be a viable option for me right now — I already struggle with building healthy eating habits, and adding additional restrictions on top of that led to me failing in my basic duty to my own wellbeing. I had to step back and re-evaluate my priorities, which led to me deciding that whilst going fully veggie is still a long term goal, for now, I’m just going to focus on reducing the amount of meat products I eat.
I feel a bit uncomfortable to have to make that compromise, but that’s sort of the point, I reckon. Having to walk the tightrope between values that are in tension with each other is our opportunity to show our moral mettle. It’s ultimately a personal choice, so there aren’t really any right or wrong answers (because we’re the ones grading our own tests, so to speak). We’ve just got to be mindful about it, and try not to beat ourselves up so much that we end up making it harder to make choices that feel right.