Edit: this is meant to be a shitpost. I don’t care about your favorite series/universe. You do you.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wanted to try Star Trek recently, but found out it’s like 1000 episodes and 15 movies, so it might take a while. Though I’ve heard not everything is worth watching.

    Can anyone from Star Trek’s fan base provide some more insights on which shows can be safely skipped, if any?

    As for watch order, I’m gonna go with release date order, unless there are any special circumstances.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The ones worth watching in my opinion are, The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager, finally Strange New Worlds and Lower Decks together. As for The Original Series, Enterprise, Discovery, Cadets, Picard, and the rest can be skipped. The Original Series is fun to go back to but it’s so unlike the rest I can’t get into it.

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Putting strange new worlds above TOS is inconceivable to me. S1 of TOS alone has several episodes well above the best of SNW (Corbomite maneuver, city on the edge of forever, Balance of Terror). Though there’s also a decent amount of poorly aged material… pretty much agreed otherwise. Also, I agree they should watch SNW, just not in lieu of TOS

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Personally, I liked Enterprise. Flock is my favorite ST doctor by a wide margin (though I haven’t seen anything newer than enterprise, other than one of the reboot movies).

        It’s a different feel from the series that came before it, way more ad-hoc with what they are doing since they are the first human ship to boldly explore the unknown.

    • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Though I’ve heard not everything is worth watching.

      You heard wrong 😎

      Seriously, if you ask ten Trekkies you’ll get twelve opinions on what’s good, what isn’t, and why. My best advice is to try everything, skip a few seasons ahead if a show is not resonating at first, and if it still isn’t hitting the mark for you at that point move on to the next series. Most shows* take a while to reach their potential, but until the recent stuff they’re all episodic enough that you can feel free to jump around a bit.

      *The original series is the exception, it pretty much hits the ground running.

  • The Infinite Nematode@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    On another note entirely, this looks like one of those memes that’s a still clip from a porn film with an amusing unrelated caption

  • 𝕲𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍🔻𝕯𝖃 (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you want to compare current stuff, then both are trash. sequel trilogy at least had the decency of being entertaining garbage while disco was 10% plot and 90% people talking about the 10% in case you missed anything while looking at tiktok.

    original trilogy and next generation are both good shit, and are good for different reasons.

  • GarboDog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Idk, Star Wars and Star Trek only share the sense that they’re both in space, overall both very different and we like both. Personally we like Star Wars more because autism brain but yeah start trek is good too :3

  • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Post TNG and Voyager, they’ve been fairly blah with a handful of decent standout episodes.

    Maybe it’s because I grew up with these shows, and now I’m old I just want something with a bit more heft.

    It’s just all seems like light entertainment these days. Something akin to The Expanse is what I’m after.

    • bobo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Post TNG and Voyager, they’ve been fairly blah with a handful of decent standout episodes.

      Lower decks! Lower decks! Lower decks!

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        not gonna sub to paramount not gonna sub to paramount not gonna sub to paramount.

        I don’t subscribe to disney either. so I’ve basically missed out of anything that wasn’t on netflix. and I’m probably going to cancel netflix too.

        • bobo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          not gonna sub to paramount not gonna sub to paramount not gonna sub to paramount.

          There, I’ve fixed it for you.

          Now do like the rest of us Orions and watch the best Star Trek since TNG.

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            ech… I’m one of those ancient weirdos who want artists to get paid for their work. and I’m already in front of screens too much for work and gaming, corpulent etc.,.

            • bobo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              And you think production is going to share their profits from a finished series with the artists?

              and I’m already in front of screens too much for work and gaming, corpulent etc.,.

              That I get 100%

              • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                And you think production is going to share their profits from a finished series with the artists?

                I don’t know if it’s still applicable to productions taking place today across the board, but SAG still exists so I have to believe a large number of hollywood productions still give residuals to people…?

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual_(entertainment_industry)

                I know for many it’s a pittance but better something than nothing at all.

                I’m probably thinking too much into all this and will catch up sometime in the future after the apocalypse. thanks for the insight.

                • bobo@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  If I’m getting this article correctly, they’re only getting paid for the success of the show within 90 days of release on a streaming platform. Everything else is based on the streaming service buying the license to show the series.

                  So the only way to maybe get them some additional pay would be for you to purchase it through some non streaming method like buying a dvd from amazon, or to wait for paramount to sell the license to a new streaming service and you take part in the whatever percentage of the service is required to watch the show within 90 days for them to get a bonus.

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            yeah I’m one of those idiots who think artists should be paid for their labors :|

            I know, it’s like… so last century. I did some arrrrrgghmatey kinda stuff when I was younger but not since like… newsgroup releases back in the protoweb days.

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              artists should be paid for their labors

              I get that, but if you’ll never pay for paramount, I imagine if you asked the artists whether they’d rather have their work stolen or never viewed at all I suspect they’d choose the former.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      The Expanse has ruined my enjoyment of most space sci-fi shows. It was too good

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, and cow shit’s better than pig shit.

      But it’s all still shit.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        What didn’t you like about Andor? And if your answer is “I didn’t see it”, then why do you already have an opinion on it?

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Andor’s the exception to the rule.

          [Edit: oh, oops, I guess I still had other comments in my mind when I was replying to that. Was replying more to the general the new stuff’s not as good as the old stuff vibe. Though still, under scrutiny, even the old Star Wars stuff has a lot of holes, and so it’s hard to build something good on that. So I guess in the case of Andor, they’ve managed to improve(?) more.]

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Andor and Solo are good, most of the rest of Star Wars including all the “space wizard” stuff is shallow as hell and far more casually cynical than Star Trek is.

    • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not sure how you can defend Solo when one of its subplots is literally “the exploitative plight of droids is funny lmao”

      • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        And also "the one droid fighting for droids’ rights is

        spoiler

        literally turned into a permanently-enslaved appliance at the end."

  • I think it’s a dumb debate personally.

    I love my space exploration show. I also love my space wizard drama, and my space politics show, and my wibbly wobbly spacey wacey show. I just like goofy shows in space.

    Except Picard. I don’t care for Picard.

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    Eh, they both have their place. I can’t get behind Jedi being emotionally stunted or the federation not using it’s tech to the fullest.

    My one exception is pre-Disney Mandolorians. Nothing is sexier than freefalling from orbit on the back of a 6 legged robot dragon with nothing but your platemail and a vague goal of scaring the shit out of locals.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      the federation not using it’s tech to the fullest.

      Funny you say that, since the Federation arguably doesn’t.

      Just look at warp drives, for example. A galaxy-class can go from reverse to full forward in a third of a millisecond. Smaller, newer ships like the Intrepid, of the Sovereign, would be both faster and even more agile.

      Federation starships should be zooming about the battlefield like dragonflies instead of slowly flying around each other like star wars ships. Though it makes some sense why they won’t, since the viewers would have a fit about it being unrealistic.

      • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        My biggest grievance is that the threat of death exists when, between replicators and transporter errors, they could populate their ships with unending clone armies to explore without ever risking anything.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not having clone armies at least makes sense, since the Federation isn’t exactly that fond of cloning sapients, inorganics aside. Too many ethical issues involved.

          • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ok, so instead of staffing a ship with 1000 duplicates of one guy who volunteers to go out and risk his life, they could add some extra storage to the transport buffer and require weekly backups of all crew. Then if redshirt #3 dies planet side they just spin him back up and tell him what went wrong. They have video game style save points on every ship and they’re using them to save on gas.

    • SatyrSack@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      My one exception is pre-Disney Mandolorians. Nothing is sexier than freefalling from orbit on the back of a 6 legged robot dragon with nothing but your platemail and a vague goal of scaring the shit out of locals.

      My knowledge of Star Wars is almost entirely pre-Disney, but I am completely lost here. What is that describing?

    • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’d enjoy the opening to Starship Troopers.

      The rest of the book is neonationalist garbage but the openinging sequence is good. And the likely inspiration for the drop you described.

      • macmacfire@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The rest of the book is neonationalist garbage

        Just have to ask…you do realize it’s satire, right?

        • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          The book? Or the movie?

          The book is 100% serious. It’s fucking ridiculous. But Heinlein is pretty sincere and uses it as his philosophical treatise. There’s more than one section where he sits everyone down in a classroom for a lecture.

          The movie is satire. It takes the themes presented and makes sure that everyone who espouses the virtues of the militant fascist state is horribly disfigured.

          • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I have a hard time getting a read on Heinlein because he also wrote Stranger in a Strange Land which is as left as Starship Troopers is right.

            • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              As I understand he wrote SiaSL to be deliberately provocative. It read to me as if he was just dreaming up the most bizarrely counter culture things he could think of and mushing them together.

              • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Stranger was considerably more thoughtful and deliberate than you’ve described, but even still how is that different than Starship Troopers? Heinlein used his novels to explore worldviews, not really to endorse them. If you start trying to pin down his sincere beliefs with any one book, you’re pretty quickly going to run into inconsistencies with the others.