• null@piefed.nullspace.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 months ago

    If this were real, consider how it would come to be. It’s obvious that even if we pretend it’s for accessibility purposes, it’s worse than just pulling up beside the bench because now you have to deal with backing into the spot.

    But what if it’s more nefarious than that? No budget to put in new benches with spikes or whatever built in. But maybe there’s room in the budget for “accessibility upgrades”. Maybe a ramp was sacrificed for this idiocy.

    • Microw@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, the only benefit this has is that someone in a wheelchair can now sit next to two people. Pulling up besides the bench always means that you’re on the end.

      • no banana@piefed.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        But since the wheelchair has a back to it and such, you’ll be sitting slightly in front of those two people meaning everyone will have a sore neck.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They couldn’t, though. Because of the space the back of the chair and the radius the wheels requires, the person in the chair would be sitting nearly a foot in front of anyone seated on the bench.

        e: look at the amount of space with my custom high-end and narrow profile chair (it’s even more space with the standard-issue chair):

        .

        Your head will be in line with the leftmost right dot if you’re relaxed. I backed my chair against a door, and that’s fuzz or something.

        That back bar prevents you from sitting ‘with’ anyone.