• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Obviously, you can’t be reasoned with

    The irony.

    When the next election happens

    Again, go get yourself enrolled in some world history classes.

    and you should factor that into your evaluation of which candidates are actually electable.

    Who did you vote for in 2024? Don’t be shy.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Claudia de la Cruz, I have never been shy about saying that.

        So let me dive into this. You literally said

        you should factor that into your evaluation of which candidates are actually electable

        and then proceeded to vote for an unelectable candidate?

        Do…do you…I mean is this really just all going right over your head?

        Are you really just that unaware?

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            No idea what you’re talking about. Sounds like nonsense from an unserious person.

            Here’s a fact.

            In 2024 the 3rd party candidate with the most votes (not Claudia de la Cruz, lol) only got half of a single percent of the total votes cast. Proving that a 3rd party candidate for president stands absolutely zero chance of winning. Which makes sense since no 3rd party has any presence in our political sphere whatsoever, including zero members in Congress.

            So you appear to be some dumbass telling people to consider the electability of their candidates while shitting on your own vote with Claudia de la Cruz, an unelectable loser.

            Good job, champ. You’re a real icon of critical thought.