ISPs tell FCC that mistreated users would switch to one of their many other options.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    If there was more than one hard wired provider in any given area, a lot more users would probably switch.

    • lgmjon64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yup. I’m in that boat. Only have one provider: the local mom and pop telephone company. Their prices are outrageous, Internet is slow and service is 50/50. Only other option is satellite Internet.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s like deciding on which criminal you want to be raped by first…there is no choice or options.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    I don’t switch providers because, for whatever reason, fiber only covers like 99.9% of my city and I don’t have any way to get them to cover the remaining parts.

    Believe me, if I could track down how/why they laid fiber and prove that they should’ve done it to my house then I would. I just don’t know to begin that process. I’ve heard fiber was laid using public grants which is why I even think it might be a possibility.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think the fixed wireless providers such as T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon Home Internet are really a game changer here because they force these crappy cable providers to actually provide good internet or lose their customers.