• Nalivai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    How is it misleading? If the words are the same, how is it misleading to write them like that? US public policy is done by tweets and telegram messages anyway

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Not really that different, if we’re talking about a wannaby autocrat who governs by insane tweets from his golden shitter

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I mean, he would never do it anyway, writing a letter on an official paper is work, and work is not what he’s known for. Did he send a message from a shitter to the guy he has that writes it on an official paper, or did he send it directly to the intended recepient? Fuck does this matter at this point, both actions has the same political power.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I’m having a go at the reporting. Any excuse can be used to label something “fake news”. The standard of the truth needs to be high.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Is the content different? Did he actually send this words or not?
        Because if not, then yeah, format and method of communication doesn’t matter here. This is how he governs, by sending tweets and whatever scribbles to some people to then implement.