theHRguy@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoRing Cameras Join Flock and Amazon to Now Create Direct Data Access for ICElemmy.worldimagemessage-square209fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down16file-text
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1imageRing Cameras Join Flock and Amazon to Now Create Direct Data Access for ICElemmy.worldtheHRguy@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square209fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·3 days agoDammit, I fell for rings assurances of “only in response to a warrant”. Mostly out of laziness, but still …… I really am going to have to figure out self hosting a video doorbell, aren’t i
minus-squareCosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 days agoBare in mind that the government requires a warrant to obtain data against you, the barrier in which to get a warrant requires probable cause. Obtaining data about you from a company only requires a subpoena if the company doesn’t cooperate. BUYING data about you from the same company is completely allowed. Until we get privacy laws, we are truly fucked.
minus-squareBuelldozer@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoIt’s easy to do. Mine is a reolink piped through Home Assistant.
minus-squaretempest@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days agoUbiquiti offers a product that will do that out of the box iirc but I have no idea if it’s good. Still ring has been handing stuff to the cops for years at this point. They only “stopped” recently and I guess started again.
minus-squareKairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 days agoOnly problem with the Ubiquiti offering iirc is that it offers no storage, you need a controller with storage installed.
minus-squaretempest@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoI mean that is expected, though I guess that is my bias. I just meant that is was more “layman” than running your own storage system.
minus-squarerumba@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days ago Ubiquiti offers a product that will do that out of the box You need to host a controller for it. It needs the Protect platform to interface with. You can host that for free. The hardware is fine. The included app is marginal it supports onifv and can be added to blue-iris or frigate.
minus-squarenodiratime@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·edit-23 days ago Sorry, wasn’t meant as a slight against you. Remember people: Proprietary systems are never yours. And in this case, they own you.
Dammit, I fell for rings assurances of “only in response to a warrant”. Mostly out of laziness, but still …… I really am going to have to figure out self hosting a video doorbell, aren’t i
Bare in mind that the government requires a warrant to obtain data against you, the barrier in which to get a warrant requires probable cause.
Obtaining data about you from a company only requires a subpoena if the company doesn’t cooperate.
BUYING data about you from the same company is completely allowed.
Until we get privacy laws, we are truly fucked.
It’s easy to do. Mine is a reolink piped through Home Assistant.
Ubiquiti offers a product that will do that out of the box iirc but I have no idea if it’s good.
Still ring has been handing stuff to the cops for years at this point. They only “stopped” recently and I guess started again.
Only problem with the Ubiquiti offering iirc is that it offers no storage, you need a controller with storage installed.
I mean that is expected, though I guess that is my bias. I just meant that is was more “layman” than running your own storage system.
Sorry, wasn’t meant as a slight against you.
Remember people: Proprietary systems are never yours. And in this case, they own you.