Most of my post history is correcting misinformation of the sort you spew out. I’ll post once and then spend many more comments responding to people doubling down on being wrong, like you.
You’re posting is literally on one comic and one issue. You don’t have any relevant credentials which we’ve already established. On numerous occasions mods and admins have come to slap your s*** down, also calling you transphobic.
There is a possibility as remote as it seems that, yes somehow you as an individual are the arbiter of knowledge on this one topic. Or, You’re just some poorly educated loser insisting on pontificating on this one issue.
As stated elsewhere, I’m not the arbiter of knowledge on this topic, and I’ve helpfully included links that you can use to educate yourself when you’re ready.
You keep on obsessing about me. I should be flattered I guess, but it seems unhealthy for you.
Except this isn’t “biology being real”. It’s non empirical. If you abide by the theory of evolution (which I assume you do), then you should be against teleology in biology, since there is no such thing, concretely, as a “body that’s supposed to do things”. It’s just layman speech to inform those that aren’t that far in biology (or to shorten things, since you assume your college knows anyway) “this is one of the possible things that a being (or its system) does in order to survive/reproduce”, not that it is necessary. To imply that it’s necessary would be to imply that nature has a will, or that there is some sort of supernatural will Teleology in biology
Ok. What you are posting will assist in denying that.
Look at the history. That’s all this person does.
Most of my post history is correcting misinformation of the sort you spew out. I’ll post once and then spend many more comments responding to people doubling down on being wrong, like you.
You’re posting is literally on one comic and one issue. You don’t have any relevant credentials which we’ve already established. On numerous occasions mods and admins have come to slap your s*** down, also calling you transphobic.
There is a possibility as remote as it seems that, yes somehow you as an individual are the arbiter of knowledge on this one topic. Or, You’re just some poorly educated loser insisting on pontificating on this one issue.
Who knows? 🤷♂️
As stated elsewhere, I’m not the arbiter of knowledge on this topic, and I’ve helpfully included links that you can use to educate yourself when you’re ready.
You keep on obsessing about me. I should be flattered I guess, but it seems unhealthy for you.
Hey man I came to laugh at a funny comic. You happened to be here once again with the same dribble.
Be whatever you want to be because unfortunately one of those things is a transphobe.
I think that biology being real is not an affront on transgender individuals.
denying real biology just because it can lead to a few bad feelings is a very dangerous road. both can exist, and do. harmoniously.
Except this isn’t “biology being real”. It’s non empirical. If you abide by the theory of evolution (which I assume you do), then you should be against teleology in biology, since there is no such thing, concretely, as a “body that’s supposed to do things”. It’s just layman speech to inform those that aren’t that far in biology (or to shorten things, since you assume your college knows anyway) “this is one of the possible things that a being (or its system) does in order to survive/reproduce”, not that it is necessary. To imply that it’s necessary would be to imply that nature has a will, or that there is some sort of supernatural will Teleology in biology
Edit: clearing things up and syntax
How does posting scientific fact assist in denying trans people bodily autonomy?
it adds further fuel to the opinion of “there are only two genders, trans people are ____” (insert insult here)