They went to a judge and got a warrant to investigate the scene - a public area, that’s already unusual - and the brownshirts refused.

The level of bullshit went up a lot more just then.

  • hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Police of a state have jurisdiction about the unlawful murder of their own citizens. The 10th amendment specifies powers not explicitly given to the feds belong to the state. The feds control interstate commerce, foreign relations, that’s about it. They have ursurped a lot of authority over the centuries, but claiming they can execute people contrary to both federal and state law and hold themselves harmless is a new one.

    You might want to associate me with cop haters making that point, because you can’t argue the actual point. Local authority includes people executed locally contrary to law.

    By not charging, and laying down, they guarenteed impunity, not a thing for federal agents to think twice about. They don’t have to worry about a state grabbing them, shipping them back. Not unless they cross the federal leadership.

    Arguments that federals can execute citizens under false pretense contrary to law with impunity would never be accepted by red states, yet here you are.

    • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I agree with everything you said. HOWEVER.

      No police officer wants to be the one that gets the 10th Amendment challenged in court. These rules you described only exist UNTIL they are challenged.

      Do you want them to be challenged given the current SCOTUS?

      I don’t. As it would be a literal constitutional crisis. One that our currupt SCOTUS would forever change the norms of given the opportunity. State police are making sure they aren’t the ones providing said opportunity.

      Because once SCOTUS corrupts the constitution, we will be actively in a civil war between their interpretation of the constitution, and what was before.

      I’m aware of what the rules are. I’m also aware of how most of them have changed through Trumps court and likely will continue to given any and all opportunity.

      It’s wise to not give them any.