I’m sorry to say this, but your son is an idiot then and doesn’t understand anarchism.
Anarchism is, of course, by its nature, a very broad term that covers many different views. But survival of the fittest isn’t a tenet held by almost any anarchists. Support of fascism definitely isn’t a tenet held by any anarchists.
No authority doesn’t mean no consequences. If he intends to harm others then he can’t be surprised when they enact harm upon him in response.
If he’s inclined to read, there’s many books available here which go into detail about various forms of anarchism:
I’m sorry to say this, but your son is an idiot then and doesn’t understand anarchism.
Anarchism is, of course, by its nature, a very broad term that covers many different views. But survival of the fittest isn’t a tenet held by almost any anarchists. Support of fascism definitely isn’t a tenet held by any anarchists.
No authority doesn’t mean no consequences. If he intends to harm others then he can’t be surprised when they enact harm upon him in response.
If he’s inclined to read, there’s many books available here which go into detail about various forms of anarchism:
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/special/index
Proudhon, Kropotkin, Graeber, Bookchin, and Goldman are some authors he could begin with.