• peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    What

    Buy our fighters jets or we invade with fighter jets ?

    What absolute fuck is wrong with this country

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, I definitely read.

        Canada doesn’t want to pay for the massive cost overruns. The US said “fine, but we’ll have to shore up the NORAD system by sending OUR fighters into YOUR airspace as necessary.” If there is no agreement as to how that occurs and the US does it anyway, that is an invasion. Quite literally.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Part of NORAD already allows both Canada and the US to enter each other’s airspace in the interest of dealing with threats. This is an existing negotiation.

          What the ambassador is stating is that if Canada does decide to backtrack on the program (which full disclosure I agree with because they failed to meet their deadline and the cost overrun is through the roof), In order to “prevent gaps”, they would increase their f35 presence Which is also why they referenced that they would need to alter the current NORAD plan.

          This is a quote from one of the sources that the article uses for its claims.

          “NORAD would have to be altered,” U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra told CBC News in an exclusive interview at Luke Air Force Base in Arizona. He says the United States would likely need to purchase more of the advanced fighter aircraft for its own air force, and would fly them more often into Canadian airspace to address threats approaching the U.S. “If Canada is no longer going to provide that [capability], then we have to fill those gaps,” said Hoekstra.

          The Posted article cherry-picks the hell out of its sources to try and make a mountain out of a mole hill.

          The entire article could be summarized with “US ambassador states that if Canada backs out of F-35 deal, US will need to increase resources to fill the gap” But instead of doing so, the author decided to make a title that makes it indicate that the US ambassador is threatening to invade Canada over it. Disingenuous reporting.

    • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not even close.

      They’re suggesting that Canada won’t be able to defend its own airspace so US will have to be able to operate more freely in Canadian than they already do. They are saying that the NORAD agreement would need to be updated to accommodate this.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          And neither Finland nor Sweden are at war with Russia. Bullshit scare tactic used by fucking putin yes, but it’s not itself an act of war. At least, it isn’t generally treated as such.

          • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 month ago

            You seem to be applying a pretty strict definition to what is actually an arbitrary term. An act of war can be anything that any nation wants to call an act of war.

            So I guess we should probably just use some of the countries involved in the real life case we are talking about.

            Does anyone consider violation of airspace by a nations warplanes to be in-and-of-itself an act of war or at least a proactive action worthy of escalation and retaliation? Oh yeah, the United States does. And so does Russia.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I’m not applying a strict standard, I’m using the two examples you gave to illustrate my point that it’s much more complex than they thought. Finland and Sweden aren’t at war so no, at least in those two cases its not a declaration of war.

              • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Just kinda decided to pretend we were talking about “declarations of war” now? I can see you are either not interested in having a grown up discussion or you’re genuinely unable to have one.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  That’s the whole subject being discussed. Here’s the OP comment we’re all replying to:

                  Where they ask if this is a declaration of war. Not sure how that’s pretending anything.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      NORAD already has shared skies provisions. US jets can fly into our airspace as needed to intercept foreign attackers. We can do the same with them.

      None of this constitutes a threat, despite Hoekstra’s weird, fumbling attempt to deliver it like one.

      He basically said “If you don’t give us your business, we’ll have no choice but to protect your airspace even harder!” Oh, wow, scary. No, please, don’t do that.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I will continue to post this every time someone insinuates that someone else should murder Trump/ICE Agents/ etc. Do it yourself or better yet, you can focus on protecting you and yours instead.

      In the US we have the Second Amendment. The fascists have been the ones screaming and yelling about the Second Amendment, but the truth is that all Americans have the right.

      Owning a gun isn’t enough. Driving to Cabela’s and picking up a vermin killing .22 is not enough. You should buy a proper rifle, a pistol, and a knife or baton. (Bonus points for a shotgun) Then you need to train with said rifle, pistol and knife/baton. Go to a range and shoot. Look for local self defense/hand to hand combat with a weapon classes and train.

      I am not advocating for violence…far from it. But I am advocating for knowledge because owning a weapon and not knowing how to use it is a recipe for disaster.

      PS: If you can afford it, buy suppressors or active hearing protection. Especially for your rifles. Suppression for the common citizen isn’t about stealth like in the movies, it is about protecting your hearing. Guns are LOUD. Much louder than you expect. At the bare minimum, make sure you have quality active hearing protection.

      • FirstCircle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Guns are LOUD. Much louder than you expect.

        Especially handguns. As a kid I’d shot lots of rifles including some beautiful .22s and the latter weren’t very loud. As an adult I picked up a .22 pistol and figured I’d go out in the woods and plink a little w/it. First shot … holy hell, WTF was that?? Yeah I got my hearing back but I’ve never pulled a trigger again w/o ear protection.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Give us money or we will attack you” is generally not something you say to an ally you want to keep. Trump is literally insane, trying to start WW3.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      In his narcissistic mind, everyone else is just there for him to exploit. He literally can not comprehend any other way to do things.

    • Toto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thanks for this. Was scrolling through the comments looking for a reply I could get behind.

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    You know, like you do to allies when the commander in chief isn’t a Russian asset.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is just robbery, we weren’t able to make our schedule and modified the price. “$27.7 billion in cost – up from its initial $19 billion.”

    Yet expect them to just give us $7 billion dollars because we failed to meet the contract?

      • Archer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Now I want a short story where the Mob accidentally hires the most effective project manager ever

        • Thassodar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          There’s actually an anime where a corporate worker gets summoned into another world because they need him to use his efficiency to get their shit together.

          It’s called “Headhunted to Another World: From Salaryman to Big Four!”, and it’s pretty good.

    • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Stupid motherfuckers haven’t learned anything from the past year. They actually think they can just bully and harass everyone into submission. They’re losing more and more influence every day.