• Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago
    1. Buying from America’s enemy sends a very different message. Just building your own missile looks like America’s vassal having pout; it’ll be used against NATO’s(read America’s) enemies anyway, essentially doing what Trump asked all NATO members and increasing their contribution to America’s sphere, for free. Cozying up to the other superpower signals that Canada is actually prepared to break it off if the US doesn’t cut yall a better deal.

    2. Does Canada have the kind of military aerospace background to speedrun a program like that? Genuinely don’t know.

    3. Do you think you can build it cheaper than the Chinese will sell it to you? Even if you had all the production documents, you can’t just replicate the half century of central planning that lead to cheap material, tooling, labor, engineering knowledge, etc that makes manufacturing in China so cheap.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Do you think it could have been bribery? Lockheed and Boeing have a history of doing so, both legally and illegally. That time a porn-star 9/11’d a yakuza’s kitchen was revenge for this.

      • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago
        1. We still do. That was a nascent effort, not some built up military industrial complex and it still exceeded all rivals at the time.

        2. Why? Being a supplicant to a bully.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago
      1. Going from supplicant to one abusive superpower to another sends the wrong message. Carney’s Davos speech spelled it out for you.

      2. Yes. We have virtually all the skills, expertise and knowhow with a few notable exceptions. (Submarines, we could build them but at great cost and a learning curve.) We could build nukes in a year if we wanted to. The delivery system would take longer than the payload, but we could do that too.

      3. Chinese goods are cheap because market function and the profit motive was not of central concern, neither human rights, labour rights or environmental rights. Your claim of “cheap” is badly distorted. There were costs born by the Chinese peoples across each of these domains that don’t show up on an invoice, but the bill always comes due and is paid in full. Your definition of “cheap” is a perversion of full cost accounting to suit a narrative.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        one abusive superpower to another

        So don’t put yourself into a situation where either can force abusive terms on you, not that China’s terms have been abusive, as evidenced by the development of countries who take chinese loans vs the eternal “developing” of countries which accept western “help”. I’m not even advocating entering China’s sphere, just having the threat available that the US can’t push any terms with no fear of consequences.

        Chinese goods are cheap because market function and the profit motive was not of central concern

        Correct, building the means of production was. Now they’ve done that, one unit of labor goes a lot further when you’re regularly setting up complex, automated assembly lines in days. If market function was the central concern, China would look like India or Africa; still exporting cheap resources and labor while your own people starve.

        human rights, labour rights or environmental rights

        Maybe 25 years ago when they had children working in machine presses and rivers that turned funny colors, it’s a different country now.

        We could build nukes in a year

        I don’t know if anyone’s ever set up plutonium extraction and refinement that quickly, even if you had design documents for the nuke itself.