It wouldn’t be on a whim. It would be for provable, demonstrable violations of the constitution, but you go ahead and keep pretending that presidents are kings.
Treason is treason, and that fuck is GUILTY AS CHARGED. Anyone who disagrees is just a fucking ignorant accomplice.
It’s the courts’ responsibility to sentence people for provable, demonstrable violations of the law. Indictments were brought against Donald Trump, but then millions of assholes reelected him, and here we are.
lol there were a thousand things he could’ve done, but didn’t. That’s the point! He did NOTHING to prevent this.
Despite a clear and present threat to the country, he did NOTHING. That’s a dereliction of duty. Period. When Trump DOES prevent the next Democrat from winning, you will see what the president can actually do.
In any case, defending a president as above the law is not only utterly pathetic and moronic, it’s literally also an unconstitutional position… Congratulations on defending a stance Trump has.
Congratulations to Democrats on utterly failing to defend every single axiom this country is supposed to be founded on and handing the keys to lunatics.
They proved they are less than useless, and you fucking idiots still picachu-face at the populace choosing “anything else” over something provably inept…
I personally wrote that list, albeit like a week ago. I don’t use AI for anything, ever, I think an LLM is a liability machine.
If presidents can send opponents to prison on a whim our democracy would have ended a long time ago.
It wouldn’t be on a whim. It would be for provable, demonstrable violations of the constitution, but you go ahead and keep pretending that presidents are kings.
Treason is treason, and that fuck is GUILTY AS CHARGED. Anyone who disagrees is just a fucking ignorant accomplice.
It’s the courts’ responsibility to sentence people for provable, demonstrable violations of the law. Indictments were brought against Donald Trump, but then millions of assholes reelected him, and here we are.
lol there were a thousand things he could’ve done, but didn’t. That’s the point! He did NOTHING to prevent this.
Despite a clear and present threat to the country, he did NOTHING. That’s a dereliction of duty. Period. When Trump DOES prevent the next Democrat from winning, you will see what the president can actually do.
In any case, defending a president as above the law is not only utterly pathetic and moronic, it’s literally also an unconstitutional position… Congratulations on defending a stance Trump has.
Congratulations to Democrats on utterly failing to defend every single axiom this country is supposed to be founded on and handing the keys to lunatics.
They proved they are less than useless, and you fucking idiots still picachu-face at the populace choosing “anything else” over something provably inept…