Im going to assume you are being serious. I looked at the picture using my eyes.
Also why would the face be blocked if she was a consenting adult? The redactions were done reportedly to protect victims. Victims of child sexual abuse and trafficking.
Are you serious? You determined she’s definitively <18 by looking at a photo of exclusively her body?
why would the face be blocked if she was a consenting adult?
You’d have to ask Pam Bondi. They redacted all sorts of things, with no explanation provided. It would be completely reasonable to block out the faces of any women who were not suspected of being involved in any way as not to drive unwanted attention.
And if they weren’t a victim their faces wouldn’t be hidden. Having your arms around a victim in your lap “isn’t evidence of wrongdoing”?? Wow and just like that, “fact checking” is back in style.
Thats a girl. Not a woman. A child.
It might be Melania, as somebody pointed out here: https://lemmy.zip/comment/24360899
How do you know that?
Im going to assume you are being serious. I looked at the picture using my eyes.
Also why would the face be blocked if she was a consenting adult? The redactions were done reportedly to protect victims. Victims of child sexual abuse and trafficking.
Are you serious? You determined she’s definitively <18 by looking at a photo of exclusively her body?
You’d have to ask Pam Bondi. They redacted all sorts of things, with no explanation provided. It would be completely reasonable to block out the faces of any women who were not suspected of being involved in any way as not to drive unwanted attention.
And if they weren’t a victim their faces wouldn’t be hidden. Having your arms around a victim in your lap “isn’t evidence of wrongdoing”?? Wow and just like that, “fact checking” is back in style.
That’s not true given the current administration.