UltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoNot that limitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1523arrow-down127
arrow-up1496arrow-down1imageNot that limitlemmy.worldUltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·1 month agoThere’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
minus-squareAlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·edit-21 month agoChatGPT is such garbage. edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
minus-squarebunchberry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
minus-squareSeptugenarianSenate@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoclaude is gaud
There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
ChatGPT is such garbage.
edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
claude is gaud