• kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Not sure what the manufacturers were thinking, this chart has existed for a long time, you have to be sitting pretty close or looking at a rather large screen for 8K to make sense

      • olympicyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 days ago

        1440p screens are all monitors you sit 2-4’ from. That close you can justify a higher resolution but people pick 1440p for other reasons like frame rate.

    • Hazzard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Yeah, most people aren’t within 6 feet of their TV, and most people aren’t buying 100" TVs either. 8K is relevant for virtually nobody.

      A lot of companies are successfully working on larger panels (I saw something about a 165" TV recently), so 8K may have a good place in a theatre room one day, but that still leaves you a lot of problems to solve first, and is far from mainstream until all of that becomes a lot cheaper.

      • djdarren@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 days ago

        We bought a 60" LG LCD first. It was too big for our living room, so when the backlight went faulty and we were offered a refund we chopped it in for the 55" OLED, which is basically perfect for our room.

        Turns out 5" really can make a difference.