• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    A general strike is part of the end goal of organizing. Not a means how to get people organized.

    That’s like wanting the grown-up version of your child to ask for parenting advice.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Strikes are the only tool available to the put upon workers of the world in repressive one party states. In 1905 in Tsarist Russia, there was no way to effect anything most often, than not showing up for work collectively. For every group of picketers or protesters they put the cossacks on, the strike would spread to new groups, acheiving a general strike of a sort, and in the end wringing major concessions from the tsar, rendering it more of a constitutional monarchy as their western counterparts had long achieved more controls on the monarchy with a sort of parliment curtailing behavior and ok-ing spending.

      Obviously the first world war put the kaibosh on all of that, with their 5 million casualties and starvation and revolution, but there is a lesson to be learned there anyway, in a brutally repressive one party state, with an unquestioned ruler able to order death to any for any reason at any moment, only strikes were able to achieve any moderation of their behavior.

      Your argument here is ignorant of both history and their situation.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Here’s the most important word of your comme/t:

        collectively

        How are you going to organize a general strike if the people aren’t organized?

        Does the vanguard party declare a “general strike”? /s

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Stop trying to nitpick, you aren’t very good at it, and have nothing here. This is ad hoc anyway, what’s your real reason for this?

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            8 days ago

            Because “let’s do a general strike!” Is waaaay too abstract for agitation. It’s clicktivism, at best.

            In the time you explained how a general strike would save us all, you could have organized with your co-workers (agitating them in the process).

            I never said that strikes aren’t the sharpest tool for the proletariat. But strikes come from real-world organizing. Not annoying each other to death on the fediverse.

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              You are the one misunderstanding what I’m saying to make me look like an asshole here.

                • hector@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Wildcat strikes, wildcat unions, in areas where they can’t form unions officially. Everyone just stay home, and the more they force people back to work the more the strikes can spread.

                  What else would you do in China? I don’t see any other tools available to them.

                  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    8 days ago

                    It’s a bit of a chicken-and-egg-problem. People don’t do wildcat strikes (based, btw.) without them thinking that they can pull it off. You need organizing for that.

                    I don’t know enough about China to have a solution. I just mistook you for some “general strike romanticist”.