He says the use of the military funding mechanism is meant to disburse funds quickly, without the typical bidding war among contractors, which would typically create a period of public scrutiny. Using the Navy contract means that new projects can be created with “task orders,” which can be turned around almost immediately, when “specific dates and locations are identified” by DHS.
“It means the infrastructure is currently a ‘ghost’ network that can be materialized anywhere in the US the moment a site is picked,” Manríquez wrote.
The enemy is at the gates because they are manning them.
So I read this as the navy doesn’t need $45B and can be cut back.
Also of military is not supposed to be deployed domestically, shouldn’t this also be unconstitutional?