merdaverse@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · edit-21 month agoWSJ is catching uplemmy.worldimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1548arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1547arrow-down1imageWSJ is catching uplemmy.worldmerdaverse@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · edit-21 month agomessage-square18fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaree8CArkcAuLE@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 month agolook at the footnotes for the graphs: Corporate profits* Labor compensation† that dagger is quite ambiguous.
minus-squareDonkter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 month agoThey run this headline but to them they’re just remarking on the weather. “Oh, seems like profits are going to capital today. Oh well, that’s the invisible hand of the market I guess. Nothing sinister here.”
minus-squareShellbeach@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoTo be fair, that’s not their place to get outraged. They should report all facts like the weather and leave the opinion up to their readers.
minus-squareIronBird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 month agolol, the WSJ is owned by Murdoch. it’s just fox news for rich people who think they’re smarter than they are.
look at the footnotes for the graphs:
Corporate profits*
Labor compensation†
that dagger is quite ambiguous.
They run this headline but to them they’re just remarking on the weather.
“Oh, seems like profits are going to capital today. Oh well, that’s the invisible hand of the market I guess. Nothing sinister here.”
To be fair, that’s not their place to get outraged. They should report all facts like the weather and leave the opinion up to their readers.
lol, the WSJ is owned by Murdoch. it’s just fox news for rich people who think they’re smarter than they are.