lumpenproletariat@quokk.auM to Memes of Production@quokk.auEnglish · 18 hours agothe trouble with anarchism is all that libertyquokk.auimagemessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up1222arrow-down11
arrow-up1221arrow-down1imagethe trouble with anarchism is all that libertyquokk.aulumpenproletariat@quokk.auM to Memes of Production@quokk.auEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square141fedilink
minus-squareGrainne@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours ago The only way it would be better under anarchy is that you would no longer be shouldering the moral burden of participating. And instead would have the moral obligation to act. In a democracy you give all power to act to others, who never do act. Yet you tell yourself ‘I did my part, I voted, it’s the politicians fault’.
minus-squarepaultimate14@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours ago That’s a republic, not a democracy. There’s plenty of room to participate even in democratic republics. It’s not as if you just elect 1 supreme ruler and everyone else goes home. Thus even in democracy you are burdened with the moral dilemma of inaction.
And instead would have the moral obligation to act.
In a democracy you give all power to act to others, who never do act. Yet you tell yourself ‘I did my part, I voted, it’s the politicians fault’.
That’s a republic, not a democracy.
There’s plenty of room to participate even in democratic republics. It’s not as if you just elect 1 supreme ruler and everyone else goes home. Thus even in democracy you are burdened with the moral dilemma of inaction.