cm0002@infosec.pub to Linux@programming.dev · 6 days agoAn upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verificationwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1221arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.todaygestapo_usa@lemmy.dbzer0.comcalifornia@lemmy.worldDeclineIntoCensorship@lemmy.dbzer0.comstallmanwasright@programming.devpcgaming@lemmy.caprivacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1215arrow-down1external-linkAn upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verificationwww.pcgamer.comcm0002@infosec.pub to Linux@programming.dev · 6 days agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.todaygestapo_usa@lemmy.dbzer0.comcalifornia@lemmy.worldDeclineIntoCensorship@lemmy.dbzer0.comstallmanwasright@programming.devpcgaming@lemmy.caprivacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.ml
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up46·6 days agoStill fucking stupid and just a slow creep towards some bullshit like “kernel level age verification” where most Linux distros can’t possibly comply because the chip manufacturers won’t work with developers to certify unless they pay a $10,000 fee.
minus-squarepivot_root@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·6 days agoIt’s like Secure Boot but actually, 100% useless.
Still fucking stupid and just a slow creep towards some bullshit like “kernel level age verification” where most Linux distros can’t possibly comply because the chip manufacturers won’t work with developers to certify unless they pay a $10,000 fee.
It’s like Secure Boot but actually, 100% useless.