• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    Technically, it could be done. Someone did the math from the scene in the movie Predator. He could carry a weapon that heavy, including the ammo and batteries. It would be about 40kg for the gun and 25kg for the ammo. That’s very high, but not absurd, as long as he’s carrying almost nothing else. It could fire for 45s without running dry. And if you limited it to reasonable bursts of say 3s, that ammo would last a while.

    It’s not practical, but it’s possible.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      It probably would have been more of a ground asset in the last century or when dealing with invisible aliens. I can’t imagine how excited a drone operator in the modern climate would feel seeing a dude lumbering through a field carrying a heavy weapon.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        OTOH, if you’re trying to create an outpost near the enemy lines, maybe it makes more sense to have a soldier carry the minigun you want to use at that outpost through the jungle, rather than risk using a vehicle to deliver it.

        A soldier lumbering through a jungle with a big weapon is a target, but a helicopter making a delivery, or a truck making a delivery is going to be a much bigger and more visible target with fewer things to hide behind.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I’ll take “Things they make you do in Ranger School for fun,” for 500 Alex.