Religious freedom group says 200 troops sent complaints of superiors using extremist Christian rhetoric to justify war
Archived version: https://archive.is/20260303214805/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric
Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.
They absolutely do have legal mechanisms, you just described a facet of them. I get what you’re saying, but my father was court marshaled twice and prevailed in both cases. Not that it’s to be taken lightly, as I understand your point, it’s true that it isn’t some simple mechanism.
You are assuming the US is still a country of laws - silly you.
Everyone enjoys a vibes based belittling, but people are still being court marshaled and jag officers still exist.
My point was that military personnel have no legal right to simply no because it might violate constitution. Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is the only relevant document here and it gives government the final say in the outcome by design. Hence my use of terminology “slave”.
Ya, not gonna split hairs on a poor use of the word slave here. But, otherwise I agree and stated so.
Fair. I do not want to diminish the meaning of word slave as those people had no choice. Military personnel while indirectly funneled into military service through economic and other factors are consenting participants.
Heard that, one hundred percent.