• Lysergid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this a problem of the game i.e. being able to bet on anything (someone’s decision) or problem of someone having insider knowledge/influence on decision and allowed to play? In your casino example it’s dealer who is banned, not the roulette itself.

    For example insider trading is regulated, following Polymarket’s takedown logic we should ban all trading.

    In other words, would this bet be a problem if decision makers were banned from betting or profiting on it?

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      for example, insider trading is regulated

      lol, sure it is. stock market is the biggest casino around, and there are a dozen different ways to extract “liquidity”

      just like the stock market, actually enforcing the rules takes a sbmhitload of overhead and with enough influence even those aspects of the casino (SEC/FINRA/Fed) got compromised or neutered in no time at all.