tw: death, blood, gore, irony

a bit of context

I posted an ironically edited Charlie Kirk shot gif, with what I thought at the time was sufficient warning and blockage, in response to someone saying we could ai generate a gif of Hitler’s suicide. I was making a comment on how such a thing couldn’t compare. All things considered I didn’t think my comment was in that poor taste, especially given I was actively editing to give even more warning and barriers. In the end it’s not a big deal, I expect no less, but come on, give me more than “nope”


Edit:

I kind of regret making the post but the dialogue might make it worth it.

to be clear, I never thought they were powertripping and/or bastards, this was just the most appropriate community for something that at the time I felt could use more discussion.

  • kindnesskills@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Probably could have explained your justification in the time it took you to justify why you couldn’t give your justification…

    But I myself am an avid employer of “no is a complete sentence” in my personal life, so I’m not mad about it.

    • trashcan@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not mad either, I just understand this is part of why dot world has the reputation is does.