Parents and teachers who oppose the state policies sued, claiming their parental, free speech and religious rights were violated.
The Supreme Court on Monday barred California from enforcing state rules that restrict when schools can notify parents about students who come out as transgender and requires teachers to use children’s preferred pronouns.
The court, on a 6-3 vote on ideological lines, allowed a federal judge’s ruling in favor of parents who oppose the policy on religious grounds to go into effect. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had put the judge’s decision on hold pending further litigation.
The court’s ruling focused on the parents’ claim that their rights under the free exercise clause of the Constitution’s First Amendment were violated. The court also said they have valid parental rights claims under the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.
Kids are inexperienced. And It is the job of the parent to protect them. I don’t know why this comment is so downvoted. It’s pretty rational.
Yeh some parents are arseholes but for the most parents do need awareness so they can have conversations and help their child.
Most 9-11 year olds are getting their world from TicTok. Is that the better alternative to a parent who wants to help?
Not all parents are bad.
Its really not. Its an ignorant view. To demonstrate…
Thats putting “going to beat the shit out of them” in very mild terms.
Logically, the parents who have those conversations and are already accepting and open individuals don’t need a law to force this information going to the parents. Their child would come to them.
The only people being "informed* by this form of forced disclosure of individual identity are the parents who don’t have conversations with their children. Who aren’t open and accepting.
The ones who will be abusive toward their children as a result.
Parents who want to parent are free to not let their 9-11 year old get their world from TocTok.