• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes. On their laptops. Also, you don’t need to sell something for it to be a product.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      No they don’t. Yes you do. And they definitely have to sell it if you’re going to claim some sort of conflict of interest. It’s not a selling point of their laptops, because you can remove it and install any other distro, and also (more importantly) you can use the distro on any other machine. You can buy a Framework laptop and put Pop OS on it. There’s no logical reason to dissuade people from using it.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        By that logic, SteamOS is not a selling point of the Steam Deck, and SteamOS is not a Valve product.

        And yes, they do sell it on their laptops:

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          By that logic, SteamOS is not a selling point of the Steam Deck

          No, by my logic, Valve does not sell SteamOS, which is correct. Much like Pop, it’s freely available to install on any machine, including Framework.

          By your logic, Linus would hate SteamOS too.

          And yes, they do sell it on their laptops:

          Is this photo supposed to prove something? I don’t see a charge for PopOS?

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            It does not matter that they don’t charge, because you don’t have to sell something for it to be a product. You only have to offer it to a market. You can sell spranglers, and provide sprangler dinchels for free, and sprangler dinchels are still considered your products.

            Since you won’t believe me, here’s the dictionary definition of the word product. I’ve emphasized the important part.

            2 a (1) : something produced

            especially : COMMODITY sense 1

            (2) : something (such as a service) that is marketed or sold as a commodity

            - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/product

            And if you don’t trust that dictionary, here’s another:

            1 [[countable, uncountable] a thing that is grown, produced or created, usually for sale

            - https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/product

            Or if you’d rather trust an encyclopedia, here’s Wikipedia’s entry (emphasis not mine):

            In marketing and economics, a product is any object, service, or system offered to a market to satisfy a customer’s need or want. Products may be tangible, such as physical goods that can be touched and owned, or intangible, such as services, digital offerings, or rights that provide value without physical form. Products are created through processes of design, production, and distribution, and they play a central role in commercial exchange, consumer behavior, and organizational strategy.

            - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_(business)

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Okay, great, it’s a “product”. What does Framework have to gain from PopOS being perceived as a bad “product”? Do consumers think “golly gee that software seems pretty bad, guess I’ll buy Framework hardware instead”? I’m just really curious how this situation works in your head. You can’t even buy a Framework laptop with Linux.

              • hperrin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Yes. That’s the entire point here. If System76 makes this bad product, maybe their other products are bad. Maybe I should buy from a competitor. Oh, everyone says Framework laptops are great for Linux, even Framework. I guess I’ll buy from Framework instead of System76 thanks to LTT.

                Don’t you see the conflict of interest there?

                • artyom@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  No, I absolutely do not see a conflict of interest. I see a completely irrational and delusional thought process.