• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    My view on true happiness is that happiness is good and the system that creates the most happiness with the least suffering is the best system.

    I’m having trouble understanding which part of that you oppose. Is it your opinion that there should be less happiness total or that all happiness should cost equal or greater suffering?

    • greenbit@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My view is that a system based on harm, suffering, exploitation and oppression causes an unjust ceiling to the available happiness

      Edit: not even a subjective view, that’s how it actually is

      Progress is blocked arbitrarily by sticking to “it’s not that bad somewhere” thinking

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The system that demonstrably has the least suffering is built upon suffering? How do you figure?

        It’s like I’m arguing with Bizarro Superman.

        • greenbit@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Let’s put it this way: Why do you want the system to cause even that amount of suffering when it doesn’t need to be mandatory at all

          Edit I see the reply talking in circles just two comments apart. Unbelievable Epstein/capitalist apologia