__反いじめ戦隊@ani.social to Privacy@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agoFederal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027www.yahoo.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up160arrow-down11cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comusa@midwest.socialusa@lemmy.ml
arrow-up159arrow-down1external-linkFederal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027www.yahoo.com__反いじめ戦隊@ani.social to Privacy@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comusa@midwest.socialusa@lemmy.ml
minus-squareerrer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoHoping it can be defeated with a strategically placed piece of tape
minus-square__反いじめ戦隊@ani.socialOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoIn the blackbox computer?
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoOver the sensors… There’s zero chance that if these sensors fail they disable the car. You wouldn’t be able to bring them in for work. So covering the sensors should easily work.
minus-squareplz1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoInfrared sensors would be defeat-able. Integrated telemetry stuff (speed, driving habits, aggressiveness) no so much.
Hoping it can be defeated with a strategically placed piece of tape
In the blackbox computer?
Over the sensors…
There’s zero chance that if these sensors fail they disable the car. You wouldn’t be able to bring them in for work. So covering the sensors should easily work.
Infrared sensors would be defeat-able. Integrated telemetry stuff (speed, driving habits, aggressiveness) no so much.