• moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      13 days ago

      FLAC doesn’t cut anything out though. Whatever input you use, FLAC compresses losslessly. You can use 96kHz 24bit recordings and the resulting FLAC file can be decompressed back into a bit-perfect copy of the original.

      In the OP, the messages in red are correct. FLAC is like a ZIP file designed to be more effective at compressing audio files. And just like a ZIP file, you can reconstitute the original file exactly. There’s no data lost in compression.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yes if you’re transcoding a CD to FLAC it’s lossless. That’s not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about the process of digitally recording the audio in the first place.

        Nevermind the fact that nobody seems to have paid any attention to the original joke which is that the boomers who can afford high end stuff can’t even hear the difference.

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          You began this by saying

          FLAC still cuts out part of the signal. It’s limited to 20khz.

          Recording from analog to digital is lossy, in the same way as previously described about images. But this has nothing to do with FLAC.