• deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Do you think corpos wouldn’t unalive people to increase their profits?

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        That’s not what you said

        You said a company would threaten someone’s family to force them to work for that company. I am not aware of any time in recent history that a company has done this.

        Obviously a large corporation would kill people and they do.

        • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Do you need specific threats or will just the threat of death due exposure and or starving death because you can’t pay for food or shelter?

          • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            For your statements to make sense, it need to driven by a specific actor not the system as a whole. Ie, yes, a specific threat.

            • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Hmm, I haven’t found any historical examples of specific threats against families. I am a bit surprised, if they are willing to kill workers, why not also threaten their families?

              Also my statement was corpos in general. So it was a systemic argument.

          • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I don’t know, only you can know your own integrity. Are some people homeless or hungry or both because there are things they won’t do for money though? Yes, of course.