• herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I dunno, I think they’re kinda … neat, I guess? Like, yeah, they’re technically pretty ugly, but somehow in a way that makes them interesting.

      • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Trying…and failing, to think of a good portmanteau of interesting and ugly.

        Edit: intugly? Ugteresting?

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      To you.

      The peak of brutality architecture beats any other type in my eyes. It’s beautiful in a way no other building or style compares.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Unfortunately many brutalistic buildings are far off from its peak and just look like lazily designed gray blobs. High-effort brutalism can look good (or can look inappropriately evil but that’s besides the point); low-effort brutalism always looks cheap.

          • DogWater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Can you share examples of good and bad brutality buildings that are cheap? I’m just curious what you like

            • huginn@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yes but I’m currently traveling and have very limited Internet access… I’ll try and remember to do this in a couple weeks when I’m back into good connectivity.

              Plus being home will let me pull out my Big Book of Brutalism to reference.