Summary

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated that Russia rejects a weak ceasefire in Ukraine, instead seeking a legally binding peace deal ensuring the security of Russia and its neighbors.

Lavrov accused the West of using truces to re-arm Ukraine and called for agreements preventing future violations.

President Putin expressed readiness for talks with Trump but ruled out territorial concessions or Ukraine’s NATO membership, a key Russian concern.

Ukraine remains committed to pursuing NATO membership despite Russia’s objections.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Your security was not an issue until you invaded Ukraine. You didn’t want NATO on your border (even though it already was there in Kaliningrad)? Now you have it.

    No one was talking about Finland joining NATO until you invaded Ukraine. Ukraine itself wasn’t pursuing NATO membership until you invaded.

    • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Now that I’m done beating the shit out of you, what guarantee do I have that you won’t fight back, because that would just be mean”

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Kaliningrad

      Also Poland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Canada (if you don’t count the Arctic).

      The idea that Ukraine joining NATO made any kind of difference to Russia’s security is absolutely ludicrous.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        That was just the excuse. Ukraine is a mineral-rich breadbasket. They had stuff Russia wants. Simple as that. Just like the US invading Iraq had nothing to do with “spreading democracy”.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Russia’s security wasn’t at issue but the regime’s security was. Russia is like the regimes from 1984: they need constant external threats to wage war against in order to distract the opposition at home.

  • zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lavrov accused the West of using truces to re-arm Ukraine and called for agreements preventing future violations.

    Russia wants time to rearm, but doesn’t want the people they’re attacking doing the same thing.

  • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You find a way to force Russia to hand all their nuclear weapons to NATO and you got yourself a deal. Ukraine will even promise not to invade Russia once that is done.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m sure we can give the same security guarantees Ukraine got, in exchange for Russia similarly giving up its nuclear weapons.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve carefully considered Russia’s concerns and security, and after 3 years I’ve ultimately decided that I don’t give a fuck about Genocidal Fascist Warmonger’s Fee-fees.

    Ukraine’s sovereingty doesn’t end where Russian hurt feelings begin.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just a whore arguing over the price. The most natural thing in the world for a Russian politician.

  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s hard to tell by the article if Lavrov believes the bullshit he’s spewing, or if he’s just the poor guy who has to spin Putins bullshit or else fall off a balcony