“never plug extension cords into extension cords” is probably the most common piece of electrical related advice I’ve ever heard. But if you have, say, 2 x 2m long extension cords, and you plug one into the other, why is that considered a lot more unsafe than just using a single 4 or 5 meter cord?

Does it just boil down to that extra connection creating another opportunity for the prongs to slip out and cause a spark or short circuit? Or is there something else happening there?

For that matter - why aren’t super long extension cords (50 or more meters) considered unsafe? Does that also just come down to a matter of only having 2 connections versus 4 or more on a daisy chained cord?

Followup stupid question: is whatever causes piggybacked extension cords to be considered unsafe actually that dangerous, or is it the sort of thing that gets parroted around and misconstrued/blown out of proportion? On a scale from “smoking 20 packs of cigarettes a day” to “stubbing your toe on a really heavy piece of furniture”, how dangerous would you subjectively rate daisy chaining extension cords, assuming it was only 1 hop (2 extension cords, no more), and was kept under 5 or 10 metres?

I’m sure there’s probably somebody bashing their head against a wall at these questions, but I’m not trying to be ignorant, I’m just curious. Thank you for tolerating my stupid questions

  • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think it is partly a US specific problem as the quality of the extension cords really suck. Meanwhile in Eurpoe (or at least in Germany) the extension cords actually use the same wire grade as your in wall wires, so there is a basically no difference in using daisy chained extension cords versus different wall outlets (as long as the outlets are in the same curcuit)

    • tortiscu@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not necessarily exactly the same wires, but all rated for 16A, so the circuit beaker will trip long before any wire gets a chance to heat up

    • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yep, came here to write the same. We have 240V and not 120V like the US. To power the same appliance in the US you have double the Ampere and therefore higher risk of fire (correct me if I’m wrong)

      • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I strongly disagree… We just have higher standards regarding power wires. Since we have more voltage running through the wires we need tougher ones, but that is what regulation is for

        • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          So the higher Ampere doesn’t require thicker cables? Genuinely asking. The higher standards and regulations are absolutely part of why you don’t hear this rule here.

          • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Its higher voltage,but yes It does. However the higher standards take care of that, so you don’t have too weak power cables available