• Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Friend, it’s not that this is a fact, it’s that you brought it into the conversation. It’s also genuinely not all men either, the problem is that every time a woman speaks up there’s a chorus of men ready to respond “Not All Men” instead of actually listening.

    • Mustard@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This criticism only really works when it’s a woman speaking of their personal experience with men, not when it’s someone making a generalisation about all men.

      Nothing was brought into the conversation, it was an all men/ not all men thing from the beginning.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I am listening, I think it’s a case by case basis and generalizations just alienate people instead of making them empathetic or sympathetic.

      I also know that people tend to downplay women’s concerns as part of misogynistic histories, so I am mindful of that too. I do my part to speak up against these kinds of patterns when I see them

      Edit I am just giving my pov, I wish there was a way to know which approach is more helpful.

      Edit 2 but yeah, I tend to generalize too, so I get the need to do it when something annoys you enough

      • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Youre not wrong, I’m in a lot of trans circles and their type of thinking tends to be detrimental to trans men, or at least extremely isolating.

        But hey anyone that tries to enforce a gender divide is gonna have to encourage division somehow