• steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    I really prefer movies to television because they are conventionally self-contained stories without the baggage of lore or familiar characters.

    Give me a Hitchcock movie any day over something with a 3 hour runtime and a “universe” it expects me to be familiar with.

    • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d rather watch serial TV shows. Give me a 10 hour “movie” with obvious stopping points, and a plot that is better than solving some inane crime in two hours.

      • nelly_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        If they can guarantee that they’ll finish the story, I’m on board with the shows. But most of the time, the story is either cut short or it’s extended indefinitely. In film, you can usually bet that by the end, the major plot points will be resolved. You can’t say the same about television (at least when it comes to series that explore a single storyline throughout as opposed to sitcoms that have more self-contained episodes).

        There are obviously exceptions in both cases, but I’ve been bit enough times by good shows that raised a bunch of questions right before being canceled.