• Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I guess advertisers have no issues with Meta’s changes. Interesting. A few years ago, they’d be falling over themselves to signal that “hate has no place here”. But it is no longer profitable to be LGBTQ+ so let the hateful bell ring.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    LGBTQ+ Everyone, but LGBTQ+ people especially need to get the the fuck off of Meta services now, they’ve showed what side they’re on.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Straight+cis people too. I’m downloading an export of my Facebook info as we speak in preparation for closing it down.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I just deleted my old, disused Instagram account I hadn’t touched in a long long time. Nothing even worth saving since I never uploaded anything to it. It was the only Meta account I still had around.

    • misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      That sounds like encouraging queer folk to flee public spaces which sounds like a favourable outcome to the conservatives. Is giving ground the best idea really?

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I don’t know how to stress this any more clearly: A privately owned social media site isn’t actually a public space. It’s literally the definition of a private space. It’s more akin to a mall than a library. That’s the whole issue, how does it help to be on a site where all the admins have to do is shut down your speech and ban you anyway? Where everything you do, every move you make is tracked and monetized and studied to be used against you? It’s by definition a surveillance state where you have no rights.

        You realize they make money from ads and if the majority of people stop using their services they stop making enough money to function as a business? They may already have your data but you don’t need to be giving them more.

        The bigger issue is that corporations have commodified public spaces. You can take back public spaces by choosing to not use their services and convincing others not to. Facebook is already dying which is why they rolled out bullshit AI profiles and the public response to that went really badly. But they live and die by engagement so if they already are needing to turn to faking engagement to keep people on and money rolling in, then isn’t a boycott literally the way to cut them off at the knees and stop them being a public space?

        Forgive me if I didn’t make clear that everyone needs to do it, not just LGBTQ+, my point is there are very few reasons to keep using these services for any person with a conscience.

        • misk@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Like you’ve mentioned, real public spaces have been killed so by quitting FB and other corpo social media you effectively self-ostracise as there are little alternatives. Yeah, you’re playing their game but when you’re losing you need humility rather than some moral high ground. If you want to affect the change you need to talk to people.

            • misk@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Agreed but we invented other forms of communication for a reason.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Okay, let’s be clear about this: staying on Facebook isn’t “humility.” It’s selfishly selling out to simp for the fucking enemy.

            • misk@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 hours ago

              That’s the moral high ground speaking. I was like that too but at some point it was too hard to not notice that it wasn’t very effective. I’m pretty sure grannies on my local FB arthritis support group have bigger problems than navigating ethics of social media and politics.

  • bitchkat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I was in admin chat on facebook and it was blocking any posts with links to https://lemmy.world. I was talking to admins about firing up a lemmy instance and leave the FB group as a link to a lemmy community

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I haven’t in over a decade. I think I’m up to eight different word filters trying to stop news stories about this from showing up on my feed. If they didn’t have such a stupid name I could just block the term meta.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      What about WhatsApp?

      What about Instagram?

      Also does your Lemmy instance federate with Threads?

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Friendly reminder: Deleting your account won’t accomplish what you think it will.

    Facebook will still keep all data that is associated with other users as per their own disclaimer. They also still keep logs that are "disassociated with personal identifiers. "

    So all training can still occur. And understand what while Jane Smith may have deleted her account, they still have all the data it takes to indicate that User 12345 was tagged in photos with John Smith at the Burger King on 404 Fake St. And, because of that, the data that User 12345 had previously provided is ALSO John Smith’s data. And Fred Wilkerson since he was at that Burger King once. And so forth.

    And ALL that data is still there for training.

    So do what you gotta do to make it less appealing to other users. But understand your data is already out there and is never going away. Same with reddit and all other social media (which includes Lemmy).

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah but you know what? That’s still better than actively engaging with their “services”.

      Eventually, it’ll just be bots interacting with themselves, given enough time.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Eventually, it’ll just be bots interacting with themselves, given enough time.

        It seems like that’s a good chunk of it already

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yes. Like I said. Do what you gotta do to make it less appealing to other users.

        But if, for example, you are an LGBTQIA+ person who thinks this will provide any form of protection…

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If you’re in the US, sure. If you’re in Europe you can compel them to completely delete everything as per the GDPR.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        And I am sure a company that is now openly training their LLMs on copyrighted materials is going to totally comply with all of that…

        One of these days people are going to learn “But it is against the law” doesn’t apply to the rich and powerful, law enforcement, or megacorporations.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          14 minutes ago

          Training LLMs on copyright material isn’t illegal to begin with, just like how learning from a pirated book isn’t or having drugs in your system isn’t, only being in possession of these things is illegal.

          GDPR violations are on the other hand - illegal. You’re right in principle, don’t get me wrong and I appreciate your healthy cynicism but in this particular case being slapped with a GDPR fine is actually not worth keeping the data of one user.

          Edit: Downvoted for being right as usual. Bruh Lemmy is becoming more and more like Reddit every day.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Training LLMs on copyright material isn’t illegal to begin with

            Reproducing identifiable chunks of copyrighted content in the LLM’s output is copyright infringement, though, and that’s what training on copyrighted material leads to. Of course, that’s the other end of the process and it’s a tort, not a crime, so yeah, you make a good point that the company’s legal calculus could be different.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              15 minutes ago

              Thank you, I’m glad someone is sane ITT.

              To further refine the point, do you know of any lawsuits that were ruled successfully on the basis that as you say - the company that made the LLM is responsible because someone could prompt it to reproduce identifiable chunks of copyright material? Which specific bills make it so?

              Wouldn’t it be like suing Seagate because I use their hard drives to pirate corpo media? I thought Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. would serve as the basis there and just like Betamax it’d be distribution of copyright material by an end user that would be problematic, rather than the potential of a product to be used for copyright infringement.

  • madcat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    No, it means all speach is welcome. Freedom of speach is a fundamental right and anyone advocating for censorship should take a long look into the mirror before calling other people fascist.

    • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Free speech absolutists are so annoying. Your tolerance of the intolerant is so stupid. Yeah, protecting marginalized communities is fascism.

      Go outside and check the political landscape. Now figure out how this change of policy relates to that atmosphere.

      Now shut the fuck up about things you know not of. Protecting LGBTQ+ people is fascism? The fuck out of here with that.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Clearly you didn’t read the article. The first paragraph is about Meta censoring LGBTQ+ content

      On Monday, Taylor Lorenz posted a telling story about how Meta has been suppressing access to LGBTQ content across its platforms, labeling it as “sensitive content” or “sexually explicit.”

      Posts with LGBTQ+ hashtags including #lesbian, #bisexual, #gay, #trans, #queer, #nonbinary, #pansexial, #transwomen, #Tgirl, #Tboy, #Tgirlsarebeautiful, #bisexualpride, #lesbianpride, and dozens of others were hidden for any users who had their sensitive content filter turned on. Teenagers have the sensitive content filter turned on by default.

      When teen users attempted to search LGBTQ terms they were shown a blank page and a prompt from Meta to review the platform’s “sensitive content” restrictions, which discuss why the app hides “sexually explicit” content.

      People who comment on articles without reading the article itself should take a long look into the mirror before implying other people are advocating censorship.

      • 4znt1s@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Censorship is a constant. Power dynamics is a thing and will always be. Thinking that any of those big players truly care about any ideology is a mistake and the only true way of seeking “freedom of speech” is really to find your “tribe” that can support itself.

        That’s why we came to Lemmy. We don’t want to be censored by big boss, we’d rather be censored by the owners of the Lemmy instances because at least they are closer to us.

        What’s going to happen is that you will now start listening more to people that were censored while your guy was in power, while they got censored for their opinions, as bad or as good as they are, you had your chance to speak, now as long as you are using mainstream media you will sit and listen like the good user you are.

        The choice is yours Neo, either wake up and understand power dynamics or sit and listen like a good cumsoomer.

        The choice is yours.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Freedom of speech isn’t a fundamental right. If you doubt this try publicly and clearly threatening people with the intent to harm. You will be prosecuted for that action.

      You should avoid using words you almost cettainly do not understand which in this case is “fascist”.