• AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    ‘Too much power’ has never been an issue, and will likely not be an issue ever with solar. There are multitudes of technologies, especially in industry, that are currently impractical because they would consume too much energy.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      We can already massively increase generation to meet the needs of those industries whenever we want. They’re impractical due to the cost of meeting their energy requirements, not because it’s impossible.

      Unless fusion power plants are going to be free to build or last forever, they have the same practical limit as every other type of generation - they have to be paid for. It isn’t clear that fusion would be a huge step forward in cost per megawatt-hour.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The main attraction of fusion is near limitless clean energy generation. The corollary of near limitless is that per unit price will be extremely low. The tech is inherently scalable to larger reactors, and that means if you’re going to be building a reactor anyway, it’s easy to combine it with nearby industrial development plans to take advantage of it.

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          Bigger, more powerful fusion gear isn’t going to also be more expensive?

          Lots of generation technologies scale, and costs fall as they do. That’s not something unique to fusion power.