I know I know… “obligate carnivore”

  • Machinist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    14 days ago

    Unashamed omnivore, fisher, and hunter here. Working on our play farm so we can source all of our meat ethically in the future. Taking active steps to prevent the suffering of animals we consume. Don’t have an ethical or moral problem with killing animals to eat them. Prefer to do it myself so that I know that I have done my best to minimize the suffering of the critters I kill.

    I’ve been told I’m a raper and abuser.

    fite me

          • [Xe] 4f14 5d4 6s2 @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            Definitely, because the idea that humans can survive and thrive eating their biologically adequate diet from ruminants that graze on grassland instead of fueling deforestation and ridiculous carbon footprints to be fed an unnatural diet that requires supplements and insane anthropogenic change in the environment is… too stupid to even argue about.

            Why don’t you at the very least try? I mean, it should be much easier than just giving me a canned response, right?

            • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              29
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              14 days ago

              75% of all farm land goes to animals that only provide 10-20% of the common diet.

              But feel free to continue using hard words for incorrect arguments.

              • [Xe] 4f14 5d4 6s2 @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                14 days ago

                You’re unfortunately deviating the argument to industrial agriculture used to (force-)feed animals, which is not what I was talking about. I literally said “graze on grassland” but you decided to respond to something else. But the fault is mine for trying. I’m not sure what I was thinking, this never leads to anything meaningful, just defensive bullshit.

                If you want to educate yourself, feel free to investigate how grasslands work, how most of them cannot be used for anything else other than grazing (not arable), and maybe think about how ruminants actually lived and roamed the land before we started industrial/intensive agriculture and feedlots.

                Interesting comment there at the end. English is not my first language and I’m just trying to use the words that best capture the meaning I’m trying to convey. But you do you, you must feel pretty good about yourself.

                • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Even “graze on grassland” falls under this.

                  All the feed, water and land that’s required could be used for far better stuff.

                  And I seem to be more educated on this matter than you, but thanks.

                  • [Xe] 4f14 5d4 6s2 @lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    14 days ago

                    You must be joking at this point. What else can non-arable grassland be used for? What water and feed is spent on ruminants whose only dietary input is grazing? I just have no words.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’ve been told I’m a raper and abuser.

      Factory farming is absolutely industrial scale rape and abuse. The more traditional hunter-gatherer mode of existence is at least approaching “natural” levels of cruelty, but it also takes immense volumes of vacant real estate.

      It’s cool that you’ve found a way to do a little traditional animal husbandry, rather than procuring meat from the holocaust mills run by some soulless corporate horror show. But its not what I’d call economical. At least, not for anyone who commutes downtown from an apartment block.

      I think there’s a kind of ethical middle-ground for folks who can keep a deep freeze full of meat from a cow that gets butchered every couple of months. Then you’re at least mitigating the enormous waste in industrial agriculture and you can talk about animals living a relatively dignified life in a pasture rather than walled up in a cattle concentration camp. But that would mean no pink slime on demand, which violates man’s constitutional right to eat burger.

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      Fellow unashamed omnivore. The vegans have the moral high ground. I hope one day to become one. No need to shame or be ashamed of eating meat though. Changes to society take a while, shaming and blaming rarely improve the situation. It often makes things worse.

          • Machinist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Yah, I was pretty insulting. Removed for lack of civility. I enjoy venting my rage at holier-than-thou vegans. They hate the religious and fanatic comparison. I’ve dealt with a lot of religious bullshit in my life, so someone judging me by their religious standards tends to put me in a vengeful mood.