• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 年前

    The problem is that you need to check those sources today make sure it’s not just making up bullshit and at that point you didn’t gain anything from the genai

    • wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 年前

      As I said the links provide some entry points for further research. It’s providing some use to me because I don’t need to check every search result. But to each their own and I understand the general scepticism of generative “AI”

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        If you don’t check everyone source. It might be just bullshitting you. There’s people who followed your approach and got into hot shit with their bosses and judges

        • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 年前

          There is absolutely value in something compiling sources for you to personally review. Anyone who cannot use AI efficiently is analogous to someone who can’t see the utility in a graphing calculator. It’s not magic, it’s a tool. And tools need to be used precisely, and for appropriate purposes.

          My plumber fucks up I don’t blame his wrench. My lawyers don’t vet their case work, I blame them.

      • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        The sources are the same result of the search? Or at least the top results?