the intentional destruction of a people’s civilization/government
slavery
to
the people trying to escape said destruction/lingering impacts
the people moving to our nations for the hope of working for a better life, who have lower crime rates than the existing population, and are a net boon to the economy
It is beyond ridiculous, and a miscarriage of history.
Cool, cool. How do you feel about Indians and Chinese (as in the subcontinent) in Britian?
How about Syrians in Sweden?
Do you honestly believe it is logical to equate colonialism to immigration?
Yes actually. Why wouldnt they be the same thing?
You must not be very familiar with the impacts of colonialism then. Take your time and read these:
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/09/a-quick-reminder-of-why-colonialism-was-bad
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/current-affairs-magazine/
https://plato.stanford.edu/Entries/Colonialism/
Equating the two is laughable. You are equating
conquest
the intentional destruction of a people’s civilization/government
slavery
to
the people trying to escape said destruction/lingering impacts
the people moving to our nations for the hope of working for a better life, who have lower crime rates than the existing population, and are a net boon to the economy
It is beyond ridiculous, and a miscarriage of history.