"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 days agoControversial questionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up11.6Karrow-down115cross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.58Karrow-down1imageControversial questionlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 days agomessage-square114fedilinkcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·19 days agoI would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·19 days agoCool definition. Still not a majority.
I would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
Cool definition. Still not a majority.