This is dope.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    As a straight dude, my first internal knee-jerk reaction was “this is such a stupid solution to a stupid problem”, but then my mental “Don’t be an asshat because not everybody is like you” guard rail kicked in.

    Clearly this is a product for a market of people that it works for and I’m happy for them. Enjoy your neat keyboard thing, long nailed peeps.

    • you’re absolutely right. this is a stupid solution for a stupid problem. But you’re also right that this is a product for a special subset of people that need this and whom this works for.

      Both can be true.

      That’s the nice thing about capitalism (free market economics actually): You don’t have a authority that decides what is useful and useless, what gets produced and what doesn’t. Because in the End, everything is useless. I have a robotvac because I’m too lazy to vacuum myself. Stupid and Lazy. I have a Vacuum cleaner because I’m too lazy to use a Broom. Stupid and Lazy.

      So yes, it’s both. Stupid solution to a stupid problem. But it’s also a great product that solves a problem that a subset of our population has and therefore useful.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        You don’t have a authority that decides what is useful and useless, what gets produced and what doesn’t.

        Well sort of, the “authority” in the case of a truly free market is The Market (or The People, if you will.) If it sells it sells, if it doesn’t it doesn’t, The Market will decide.

        That said, I agree with the rest of your statement and realize that you meant authority in a truer sense, and I in more of a metaphorical sense.

      • Etterra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        *want

        People want this, they don’t need it. Because nobody needs to have nails like that - they choose to. If they want to look silly, that’s their prerogative, but let’s not call it anything other than a personal choice and not a necessity.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          But if you have the nails, then you need something to make it easier to type, assuming your job involves a lot of typing. Just because the need was created by fulfilling a want doesn’t make it less of a need, because at the end of the day, anything could be reduced down to wants instead of needs, and that’s not helpful.

          • Etterra@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Except they don’t. Example, my fiancee is a fine dining chef, and as such has to keep her fingernails trimmed pretty short. If she decided to do the long nail thing, she’d be told to trim them. If you want to wear a party dress or beach attire to your office job, guess what, you can’t. If you wear metal jewelry and are an electrician, that stuff stays in your locker or home, same for food service.

            Utility > vanity. If your aesthetic choices inhibit your ability to do your job, then you need to make different choices. This isn’t an accommodation for a disability or religious thing. If you want your appearance to get in the way of your work and it doesn’t impact your work, then you don’t need accommodation. If it’s uncomfortable then that’s your own damn fault.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Exactly. There are a ton of stupid products out there, and ecosystems around those stupid products, and I think that’s awesome. Variety is the spice of life after all. For example:

        • self-driving cars - if we had properly designed cities and infrastructure, we wouldn’t need cars in the first place
        • shampoos and conditioners for damaged hair - only needed because we wreck our hair with bleaches and dyes
        • waist trainers/corsets - only needed because we’re lethargic and eat too much

        Yet each of those has facilitated variety. Cars are an expression of what we value, hair styles are a huge part of our identities, and plus-sized product lines can build confidence and have created a market all their own. I certainly won’t ever understand a ton of the products that exist, but I like that those products exist, because it means that there’s a ton of variety in how we live our lives.

        So yeah, keep making weird solutions to unnecessary problems. But at the same time, let’s try to do it in a way that doesn’t destroy our planet.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of people in this thread knee-jerk hating on the nails don’t realise that it’s just culturally-entrenched misogyny. More people need a “Don’t be an asshat because not everybody is like you” guard rail.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Typing with long nails is the embodiment of “beauty is pain.”

    The pain is real, but the beauty is subjective.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I will never forget when I had to help a coworker with her laptop, she had long nails that had worn grooves in her keyboard keys.

        She typed on her nails, the sound it made was terrible.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’ was a status thing. Those with manual labor jobs usually can’t have long nails, so long nails means they’re above manual labor. So the rich in the past did that, and now everybody wants to do that so and it becomes a beauty thing.

  • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    Jesus these comments scream basement dweller. You don’t have to like what someone does with their own body to accept it. It doesn’t hurt you so don’t worry about it. God forbid people have some self expression

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I accept that people sometimes keep their nails long. That acceptance comes with a caveat that I will not be eating anything handled by hands with long nails.

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t hurt you so don’t worry about it

      Eh, not so sure. Beauty standards propagate, and pressure to conform to those standards is real.
      That’s just how fashion works. In this case fashion requires disabling a functional part of your body. It’s at least a bit icky.

      • fossilesque@mander.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not though. It’s got advantages, but typing isn’t one of them. I can open stuff peel based way better etc.

        • Wilzax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          I really only need like 2 or 3 mm of extra nail on one thumb to open oranges and grapefruits perfectly fine. Anything longer than that and it becomes unwieldy and unhygienic.

          • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            On the contrary, since growing my nails out my nails have been way more clean. There is an awkward period between no nails and long nails where stuff gets caught underneath, but once you grow them out (only two weeks or so), they’re perfectly clean because there’s just more space underneath and nowhere for gunk to get caught as the angle is wider.

            my nails, for reference (sorry my power is out

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    A chiclet membrane to go over your non-mechanical keyboard, it’s like double hell.

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Actually, my giant mechanical Blackwidow keyboard is way easier to use than my laptop when my nails are long.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        How can it be easier to use keys with traditional keyswitches? You’d have more key travel.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’ve switched out keycaps to make them comfortable for me. You can customise them. I find it very hare to type on a laptop keyboard for a long time and it fucks up my posture.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Hmm. Interesting.

            If you don’t mind me asking, could you describe what alternate keycaps were used? Like, taller keycaps in the front, shorter in the back? Like, I still think that the amount of keytravel would be a negative, but maybe the issue is that the long nails descend into the keyboard given the normal position of a hand typing, and basically changing the angle improves that.

            If that’s the case, I’m wondering whether maybe it’d be possible to change the angle of the keyboard as a whole. Like, either use an external keyboard propped up differently, tilting away from the user, or a laptop with the front part of the base shimmed up to tilt away from the user.

            • fossilesque@mander.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I use softer keycaps, some are resin! I also have the back propped up like you mentioned with the built in lifts. I also have carpel tunnel so I don’t want to cram my hands into a small space and it’s OK to be slow sometimes. And a good wrist rest is key.

              • tal@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I also have the back propped up like you mentioned with the built in lifts

                Ah hah!

                Yeah, there are some ergo keyboards that have that “reverse tilt” built in. They’re aimed more at being easier on the wrist than at trying to permit for long nails, but they do exist.

                e.g.:

                https://matias.ca/ergopro/pc/

                I also have carpel tunnel

                That’d be an argument for a keyboard, like, a mechanical one where you don’t bottom out the keys on press, and then training yourself to not bottom them out, which is a big argument mechanical keyboard fans have for theirs versus rubber dome keyboards. And you need a fair bit of key travel for that, yeah. Hmm.

                • fossilesque@mander.xyzOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I’ve convinced some if my girlfriends to switch as they have white versions and Blackwidows are fairly cheap on Ebay (£50-75). :) They like them as they’re heavy writers.

  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I sometimes have medium length nails (3-5 mm past the fingertip), though I tend to just grow my own out, and I do it entirely for myself. I have a bunch of different kinds of nail polish and stencils for making cool patterns and it satisfies my inner elementary school librarian urge to dress up for even very minor holidays.

    People have come up to me and told me that my nails are too long for them to find attractive, which is a bizarre non sequitur imo. I don’t know why the assumption is that any self-decoration is intended as a sexual signal: my ideal nail-based interaction is that a little kid asks about them and I get to tell them about Arbor Day or national soup day or something.

    Sometimes they make life more difficult, and then I either find workarounds (opening pull tabs with a spoon, for example) or cut them, depending on how much time I have and how much I like my current nails.

    I get that they’re not for everyone, but I like them, so I wear them. It’s okay if others don’t like them, they don’t have to wear them.

    • i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      It blows my mind when people do that.

      “Hey, the way that you styled yourself makes me not want to have sex with you.”

      “Uhhh… Cool?”

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        And there’s a lot of people in the world that effectively get told this all their life.

        Some for things that aren’t even their choice.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ergonomic chairs are also a solution to an often self-inflicted problem. Mainly doing all kinds of things to your body when you’re young that you don’t realize you’ll regret when you’re older.

      Are ergonomic chairs a bad thing?

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly-I always wondered how in the hell women with nails even just a little bit long typed comfortably on a keyboard. I figured it was either a) not a big deal or b) a super pain in the arse and another example of the world (for whatever reason) not making a simple product to solve a simple issue (like bandaids that match people’s skin color for example).

    Now I know! :)

    Phones must be a bitch as well…. The solution to that might be a bit harder to pull off…

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve always wondered about wiping one’s ass. Seems like you’d want a nail brush handy to wash up every time.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Hmm. That’s an interesting problem to have.

    On one hand, I can’t suggest a great alternative, but man, silicone keys…I guess if they work for the author.

    Stenotypists – people who have to professionally do very high-speed text entry – do use these dinky specialized keyboards that IIRC from a Japanese-language one – I think that there were multiple Japanese layouts – can only have a home row or something. I think that they use chording or something. I don’t know if that might address it, but learning one would be a huge change. Also, I have no idea what keys they can output…given that they’re highly-optimized for text entry, they might not be able to do weird symbols.

    goes looking

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stenotype

    A steno machine, stenotype machine, shorthand machine, stenograph or steno writer is a specialized chorded keyboard or typewriter used by stenographers for shorthand use. In order to pass the United States Registered Professional Reporter test, a trained court reporter or closed captioner must write speeds of approximately 180, 200, and 225 words per minute (wpm) at very high accuracy in the categories of literary, jury charge, and testimony, respectively.[1] Some stenographers can reach up to 375 words per minute, according to the website of the California Official Court Reporters Association (COCRA).[2]

    Hmm.

    Looking at the key layout there, and here:

    https://stenokeyboards.com/

    …it looks like English-language stenotype keyboards don’t just use a single row, but rather two or more rows. So that’s probably out.

    There’s apparently a second chording layout, the “palantype” layout, but that also doesn’t do only one key per finger:

    https://www.openstenoproject.org/palantype/tutorial/2016/08/21/learn-palantype.html

    There are dedicated chording keyboards that do use only one key per finger, though.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chorded_keyboard

    That has some examples of one-key-per-finger keyboards, like the BAT keyboard (well, that has three for the thumb, but given that you hit those with the side of the thumb, I assume that it’d be okay with long nails):

    https://www.infogrip.com/bat-keyboard.html

    The problem is that (a) the BAT is discontinued and (b) you really don’t want a one handed keyboard, which is what the BAT does…it’d be better to have a two handed chorded keyboard, or you’re taking half of your fingers out of the picture.

    EDIT: Here’s an open-source, two-handed chording keyboard, the Ialboard, based on the discontinued DataHand keyboard. I’m not sure that it’d work with very long nails in its current form – they might collide with the structure of the keyboard – but it’s 3d printed and I’m pretty sure that if the format doesn’t work as-is, a tweak to the 3d-printed keys would permit for arbitrarily long nails. Just need to create a space for 'em.

    Gonna need some serious keyboard re-learning, though.

    EDIT2: Here’s another two-handed chording keyboard with one input device per finger, the CharaChorder. It uses an analog D-pad under each finger. I think that it’d have space for long nails as-is. It does have separate arrow key and mouse control sticks, and I’m not sure if those, given the placement, would be an issue for long nails. I’d imagine that if one were determined to work around that with an external mouse device and – if you use arrow keys enough to need it; I rarely do – maybe some dedicated arrow key keyboard, though I’d think that having the arrow keys in vim-style hjkl-style layout might be preferable to the inverted-T layout that seems common. I don’t know whether the barrel connector’s positioning there would be an issue, though the positioning of that is obviously not critical to the keyboard, and I imagine that if it is an issue, with a bit of work, one could relocate it.

    EDIT3: It looks like there’s another DataHand-based 3D-printed keyboard besides the above-mentioned Ialboard, the Svalboard. Same argument as with the Ialboard – I’m not sure that it’d be usable with long nails as is, but I’m pretty sure that that design could be modified with approprately-different key shapes to permit long nails to extend through a gap. You can apparently buy the thing in kit form, 3D-print it, so I figure that if someone wants to make a “longnail” variant of a few of the 3D-printed parts, that’d probably be a pretty easy keyboard to start from.

    The downside is that I don’t think that – unlike the above CharaChorder – this comes with a travel carrying case, which might be important if you’re a laptop user. I guess it’d probably be possible to craft something with foam and a shell, but that’s not off-the-shelf any more.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Words per minute meaning literally words or characters? Because 3 - 4 words per second seems a bit much to me and whoever talks that fast?

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Words per minute meaning literally words or characters?

        Words. Well, IIRC in tests it’s something like an abstract word of fixed length, something like 5 characters or something, as that’s the average word length in English. Like, it doesn’t mean you’re typing “antidisestablishmentarianism” over and over, one word each time.

        kagis

        Yeah:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute

        Since words vary in length, for the purpose of measurement of text entry the definition of each “word” is often standardized to be five characters or keystrokes long in English,[1] including spaces and punctuation. For example, under such a method applied to plain English text the phrase “I run” counts as one word, but “rhinoceros” and “let’s talk” would both count as two.

        Karat et al. found in one study of average computer users in 1999 that the average rate for transcription was 32.5 words per minute, and 19.0 words per minute for composition.[2] In the same study, when the group was divided into “fast”, “moderate”, and “slow” groups, the average speeds were 40 wpm, 35 wpm, and 23 wpm, respectively.

        With the onset of the era of desktop computers and smartphones, fast typing skills became much more widespread. As of 2019, the average typing speed on a mobile phone was 36.2 wpm with 2.3% uncorrected errors—there were significant correlations with age, level of English proficiency, and number of fingers used to type.[3] Some typists have sustained speeds over 200 wpm for a 15-second typing test with simple English words.[4]

        Typically, professional typists type at speeds of 43 to 80 wpm, while some positions can require 80 to 95 (usually the minimum required for dispatch positions and other time-sensitive typing jobs), and some advanced typists work at speeds above 120 wpm.[5] Two-finger typists, sometimes also referred to as “hunt and peck” typists, commonly reach sustained speeds of about 37 wpm for memorized text and 27 wpm when copying text, but in bursts may be able to reach much higher speeds.[6] From the 1920s through the 1970s, typing speed (along with shorthand speed) was an important secretarial qualification, and typing contests were popular and often publicized by typewriter companies as promotional tools.

        Stenotype

        Stenotype keyboards enable the trained user to input text as fast as 360 wpm at very high accuracy for an extended period, which is sufficient for real-time activities such as court reporting or closed captioning. While training dropout rates are very high — in some cases only 10% or even fewer graduate — stenotype students are usually able to reach speeds of 100–120 wpm within six months, which is faster than most alphanumeric typists. Guinness World Records gives 360 wpm with 97.23% accuracy as the highest achieved speed using a stenotype.[7]

        So it’s not a typo or whatever, if that’s what you mean.

        Because 3 - 4 words per second seems a bit much to me and whoever talks that fast?

        It’s pretty fast, but then you’re talking about a professional text-entry person using the fastest plain-text entry mechanism we know about in a speed test. I’m sure that that’s not something demanded of a stenotypist in a normal real-time transcription session.

        My guess is that you probably could still make practical use of it if you didn’t need real-time transcription by doing a recording and then playing back with software that can do time stretching to accelerate the rate of playback; you could transcribe more-quickly.

        'course, automated transcription’s getting better too, and that might also be an answer on that front.

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If only something allowed you to use the typing system you already know, was able to be rolled up, doesn’t require you to already own a 3D printer and have knowledge of modeling software, and cost less than $50.

      If only…

  • simonced@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I guess a mechanical keyboard with round ketcaps would do the trick as well. Not the same budget though…

  • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    The thing that I can’t understand about this product is why they didn’t cover the function keys. They are literally functional.

    • Cpo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Although using the top row of keys does not cause you to accidentally hit keys above it.

    • histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes but I’m guessing to also be universal some macs have the touch bar which this would then cover

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Long nails can look pretty, and while I’m sure this would help people with long nails, I think it would just give me an RSI or just be differently frustrating.

    No thanks. I’ll paint my short nails so I can—you know—use my hands. And that’s free.