• Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Breaking up homeless encampments doesn’t fix the fact that these people have nowhere to live! What a cruel policy.

    Why not emminent domain overpriced apartment buildings owned by the Saudis, Chinese, and Russians, and give the apartments away the homeless. Problem solved.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah, so simple!

      Those apartments world devolve into a human trafficking, crime ridden drug overdose havens in no time. Mental health support for them is needed first.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I never understood people like you. That the moment you help someone, the result will obviously be the worst outcome? So better not help them at all?

        • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You don’t understand because your never consider the consequences of your actions.

          Providing shelter for everyone is a basic human need.

          But forcing mentally ill people mixed together with financially downtrodden unhoused people into a Kowloon City type environment without considering their ability to maintain their cleanliness and safety without imposing jack-booted level of policing is another level of stupid I can’t force out of you without an hours long face-to-face lecture where you and I can discuss like two friendly normal people.

          • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            “force your opinion out of you over an hours long conversation like a normal friendly person”

            time for some self reflection there, baroque

            i happen to agree with you too, as would i think anyone who has spent time in an american projects or shelter system, but youve so thoroughly poisoned the argument i cant take it up here.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Providing shelter for everyone is a basic human need.

            I agree. So let’s start with the basic human need. Nobody suggested we stop there and wash our hands of it saying “problem solved.”

      • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You get them in a stable living arrangement first, and then that makes mental health support exponentially easier.

        Housing first policies work everywhere they’re tried.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    maybe California shouldn’t have a 3-5 YEAR waitlist for section 8/Housing Choice Vouchers housing?

    maybe they should force all those empty retail/commercial/industrial/residential properties to be put to use or forced to hand over to the state.

    maybe the church of scientology shouldnt be allowed to own thousands of buildings in california with no stated purposed or published staff?

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      maybe California shouldn’t have a 3-5 YEAR waitlist for section 8/Housing Choice Vouchers housing?

      I live in a deep red state and it’s that wait, or more, here, and I believe it’s a lottery system, at that.