• trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand why cryptocurrency isn’t an accepted solution to this. Open firefox, attach wallet, drip $0.25/month/user. It’s good for tiny transactions.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because crypto just has such a stink on it.

      It may well be a reasonable solution for this specific problem, but still… no one is going to get behind this.

      • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes now it does, it’s beyond soured. But it’s a strange disconnect. Ignoring all the social commentary and looking for the most practical solution for making small pay-per-use payments - it was right there.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maaaaaybe. I think the actual advantages over other methods are fairly intangible.

          If “surfing the web” required making many very small anonymous payments every hour then yeah, there’s advantages. I’ll admit that doesn’t actually sound terrible - I’d rather pay a few cents to read articles than the current advertising & subscription model.

          As a solution for mozilla in isolation though, it would be an over engineered solution with too much baggage. Current mozilla users might have the aptitude for something like this but Mozilla wants to seduce a larger market share which is not people like us.