“Schabas also found the government failed to provide evidence that removing the lanes would alleviate congestion — one of the law’s stated purposes. In contrast, expert testimony presented by the applicants suggested lane removal would likely increase collisions, injuries and even deaths.”
I made that argument to my city almost a decade ago. I dug deep in our city traffic design and planning documentation to find bike lanes were the excuse to choke vehicle traffic. Their measure of success is a reduction of vehicle miles driven. It’s not actually about safety, walkability, or bikes; we have all that already. It’s about making driving undesirable. So we have 400 miles of empty bike lanes now and unpredictable congestion. Slow clap
There’s no point presenting a logical argument to someone with an agenda.
Have you considered that those bike lanes may be enpty bscause they are poorly designed, unsafe, or don’t go places people want to go?