• vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    ISO 8601 allows all kinds of crazy time stamps. RFC 3339 is much nicer and simpler, and the sweet spot is at the intersection of ISO 8601 and RFC 3339.

    Then again, ISO 8601 contains some nice things that RFC 3339 does not, like ranges and durations, recurrences…

    https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    Is there an ISO standard for how to say, “I don’t agree with a very specific aspect of your politics, or a specific statement one of your political heroes made, for a very specific reason, but I’m not declaring myself at the extreme horrible kitten-eating end of whatever political spectrum you live in.”

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    18 days ago

    This format can fuck off. I prefer the unambiguous format 2FEB2013.

    Checkmate, date snobs.

    And yes, nations are free to use their appropriate abbreviations for the months.

  • ‮redirtSdeR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    Feb 27th 2013

    Boom. Everything is in a different format so you can order it however you want and it’s still readable.

    • Bourff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 days ago

      Why use abbreviations in your preferred language when you can have a solution that is language-agnostic and universal (for a given calendar) ?

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        Because if there’s one problem simple enough that I trust an LLM or translation app not to fuck up, it’s simple translation of month labels from on language to another. If you’re writing in English, it’s reasonable to have month abbreviations in English. If someone wants to read it in a different language, they’re going to have to use translation software or hire a human translator to do it. And regardless of translation method, simple date translation will be among the most reliable and faithfully translated parts.

        • Bourff@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Or, you know, just use plain old numerals that almost everyone on earth can read and understand without needing a translation in the first place. Why the fuck do people need to bring LLMs where it’s not needed ? Is it to pump their NVDA stocks?

  • essteeyou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    18 days ago

    My goodness, some of the comments in here must come from people who thought that those writing the standard were morons who did no research.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      I don’t think they’re morons…just slaves to convention and compatibility. Not many ways to get away from that and justify it.

  • Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    Working for a global clinical research company, DD-Mmm-YYYY is the easiest for everyone to understand and be on the same page. It’s bad enough identifying which date you’re capturing in metadata without also trying to juggle multiple date formats.

  • ljosalhusky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    You know, I used to think ISO 8601 was just a boring technical standard for writing dates. But now I see it’s clearly the first step in a grand master plan! First, they make us write the year first, then the month, then the day-suddenly, our beloved 17.05.2025 turns into 2025-05-17. My birthday now looks like a WiFi password, and my calendar feels like a math equation.

    But it doesn’t stop there. Today it’s the date format, tomorrow we’ll all be reading from right to left, and before you know it, our keyboards will be rearranged so QWERTY is replaced with mysterious squiggles and dots. Imagine the panic:

    “First they came for our dates, then they came for our keyboards!”

    At this rate, I’ll be drinking mint tea instead of coffee, my local kebab shop will start offering lutefisk shawarma, and Siri will only answer to “Inshallah.” The right-wing tabloids will have a field day:

    “Western Civilization in Peril: Our Months and Days Held Hostage!”

    But let’s be honest-if the worst thing that happens is we finally all agree on how to write today’s date, maybe world peace isn’t so far off. Until then, I’ll be over here, clutching my calendar and practicing my right-to-left reading skills… just in case.

    (Don’t worry,this was just a joke! No offense intended-unless you’re a die-hard fan of confusing date formats, in which case, may the ISO be ever in your favor!)

    Peace!

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    I propose that we amend the ISO to require the days of the week be named after their etymological roots in that language.

    English Days of the Week:
    Day of the Sun
    Day of the Moon
    Day of Týr
    Day of Odin
    Day of Thor
    Day of Frēa
    Day of Saturn

    Imagine dating a meeting, “Day of Odin, May 7, 2025.” Imagine a store receipt that says, “Day of Thor, June 5, 2025.” Imagine telling a friend, “July 4th falls on a Day of Frēa this year!”

    THIS IS WHAT WE COULD HAVE. THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE LOST. THIS IS WHAT WAS STOLEN FROM US.

    We could bring it back. We could make this the norm. We could make this real. We could summon this bit of ancient magic back into our world. Let’s remember what we actually named these days for! BRING BACK THE DAY OF THOR!

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 days ago

    I feel like YYYYMMDD (without dashes) might be a format in ISO 8601, but I’m fully expecting to be corrected soon. But I didn’t say think, I said feel. YYYYMMDD has a similar vibe to YYYY-MM-DD, ya feel me?

    • compostgoblin@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 days ago

      Nope, you are correct! From the Wikipedia page, which cites the standards document:

      • Representations can be done in one of two formats – a basic format with a minimal number of separators or an extended formatwith separators added to enhance human readability. The standard notes that “The basic format should be avoided in plain text.” The separator used between date values (year, month, week, and day) is the hyphen, while the colon is used as the separator between time values (hours, minutes, and seconds). For example, the 6th day of the 1st month of the year 2009 may be written as “2009-01-06” in the extended format or as “20090106” in the basic format without ambiguity.