• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Disciplines in mathematics assume you’re familiar with that discipline’s shorthand, constants and common forms. Also, you’re not expected to read them as you’re able to read a book. If it’s 100% your niche specialty then maybe you could, but spending and hour or two puzzling out a broad understanding of a paper is absolutely normal, even for math academics.

  • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The square you root in the second equation should go over the both integrals, but that step is pointless anyways. Just by symmetryzing the integration boundaries it’s already a Gaussian integral, which is a standard integral

  • serendepity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If this is indeed real, can somebody please point me to the paper/text? That introduction has piqued my curiosity and I wanna read the whole thing, even if the math might be incomprehensible.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is absolutely taking the piss. “No calculus is required” is obviously not true when there’s, what, five integrals on the page?