• mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is actually pretty important to being able to solve engineering problems in the real world. Invariably, every little sub industry has its own cursed unit system. And dimensional analysis is great for solving real problems on its own.

    And if you get to a high enough physics level, they start setting hbar = c = 1 or G = c = 1, and you never have to worry about it again.

    I’m the mean time, it’s worthwhile to learn the trick to do this stuff fast-ish.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I dislike that my highschool never once gave me the concept that units can simply be treated like constants to be cancelled out.

      I used to do the conversions for each variable before putting them in the equation like a fool.

      Now I’m slapping all of the conversions alongside the original values/units in a single expression like god intended.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        kWh has an intuitive reason. Watts are so small that you’d always calculate consumption in MJ and whatnot, and seconds are so short that you’d always be expressing time in ks. Using kWh will reduce the numbers to useful ranges and makes cancelling M and k unnecessary.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just divide by 3.6

    Example:

    10 km /h * 1000 m / km = 10,000 m /h

    10,000 m/h * 1h/3600s = 10,000/ 3,6000 m/s = 10/3.6 m/s

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I used to do it this way in highschool, but could never remember if it was divide by or multiply by 3.6

      Instead I now do it as you have shown, except it all goes in the same expression.

      10 km/h * 1000 m/km * 1h/3600s = 2.778 m/s

      No need for the extra steps. Slap it all in the same expression and put it in the calculator (being careful to check that the units cancel as intended)

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        M/s is faster (lower number) than km/h so… That should give you enough explanation to understand whether you need to divide or multiply 3.6 when converting.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It just never stuck. Just for me personally it’s easier to remember the base conversions of 1 km = 1000 m and 1 hr = 3600 and do the maths.

          Just my own personal preference, and when dealing with more complex units, is the only way.

  • TheIvoryTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    In a parallel universe, someone is memeing about how teachers waste our time on useless stuff and never taught us to convert between units.

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s interesting. Obviously, you’d put a center dot to disambiguate millihertz from meter-hertz, but I can’t recall ever having learned a rule about that. So some combinations of units are inherently ambiguous?

        Also: Hz/dpt.

        • renzev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I can’t tell which unit is more cursed: millihertz or meter hertz. Surely, anything that could be measured in millihertz is more natural to measure as a period, or as revolutions per minute or something, right?

          EDIT: Also, TIL about dpt. Thanks!

          A dioptre (British spelling) or diopter (American spelling), symbol dpt, is a unit of measurement with dimension of reciprocal length, equivalent to one reciprocal metre, 1 dpt = 1 m^−1.

          • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            TIL about dpt

            Tell me you don’t [Edit: need] glasses without telling me you don’t need glasses :D

            • renzev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I actually do have glasses, I just never bothered learning about any of the technical details behind my lenses. Optometrist measured my eyes, I chose the cheapest frame the store offered, came back a week later to pick up the glasses and that’s about it.

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t have time to get out a million little differently sized utensils because I need 2 cups of this, ¼ cup of that, ½ a teaspoon of the third thing etc. when I can put the bowl on a kitchen scale and use the tare function.